English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
Add to Basket
 Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary
  Balancing Sexual Autonomy, Responsibility, and the Right to Privacy: Principles for Criminalizing Sex by Deception

Scheidegger, N. (2021). Balancing Sexual Autonomy, Responsibility, and the Right to Privacy: Principles for Criminalizing Sex by Deception. German Law Journal, 22(5), 769-783. doi:10.1017/glj.2021.41.

Item is

 

show all hide all

Basic

show hide
Item Permalink: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000A-9949-8 Version Permalink: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000B-54DB-0
Genre: Journal Article

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
balancing-sexual-autonomy-responsibility-and-the-right-to-privacy-principles-for-criminalizing-sex-by-deception.pdf (Any fulltext), 251KB
View   Save
File Permalink:
https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000A-994B-6
Name:
balancing-sexual-autonomy-responsibility-and-the-right-to-privacy-principles-for-criminalizing-sex-by-deception.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
View
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Scheidegger, Nora1, Author           
Affiliations:
1Criminal Law, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law, Max Planck Society, ou_2489694              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: Due to the reconceptualization of rape and other sexual offenses as violations of one's sexual autonomy, consent has replaced the element of force as the focal point of rape law. This shift to a “consent model” of rape has prompted much discussion about the scope of sexual autonomy and the problem of “rape by deception” in legal scholarship. Most theorists of consent argue that certain forms of deception invalidate any token of consent in the same way as forcible sexual contact. However, there is also a widely shared concern that criminalizing sex-by-deception poses serious problems in terms of drawing the line between deceptions that violate sexual autonomy and deceptions that do not. This Article offers an account of principles that should be considered when examining legal cases related to sex-by-deception. These principles are examined and articulated in a way that strikes a balance between responsibility, autonomy, and rights such as the right to privacy.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2021-08-06
 Publication Status: Published online
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1017/glj.2021.41
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: German Law Journal
  Abbreviation : GLJ
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Frankfurt am Main ; Cambridge : German Law Journal e.V. ; Cambridge University Press
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 22 (5) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 769 - 783 Identifier: ISSN: 2071-8322
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/1000000000224070