Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT
  Comparing the aesthetic experience of classic–romantic and contemporary classical music: An interview study (Online First)

Mencke, I., Seibert, C., Brattico, E., & Wald-Fuhrmann, M. (2022). Comparing the aesthetic experience of classic–romantic and contemporary classical music: An interview study (Online First). Psychology of Music. doi:10.1177/03057356221091312.

Item is

Basisdaten

einblenden: ausblenden:
Genre: Zeitschriftenartikel

Dateien

einblenden: Dateien
ausblenden: Dateien
:
mus-22-men-01-comparing.pdf (Verlagsversion), 325KB
Name:
mus-22-men-01-comparing.pdf
Beschreibung:
OA
OA-Status:
Hybrid
Sichtbarkeit:
Öffentlich
MIME-Typ / Prüfsumme:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technische Metadaten:
Copyright Datum:
2022
Copyright Info:
© The Author(s) 2022 This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Mencke, Iris1, Autor                 
Seibert, Christoph1, 2, Autor                 
Brattico, Elvira3, 4, Autor
Wald-Fuhrmann, Melanie1, Autor                 
Affiliations:
1Department of Music, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Max Planck Society, ou_2421696              
2Institute for Music Informatics and Musicology, University of Music Karlsruhe, Germany, ou_persistent22              
3Center for Music in the Brain, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark, ou_persistent22              
4Department of Education, Psychology and Communication, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Italy, ou_persistent22              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: aesthetic experience, contemporary classical music, atonal music, musical pleasure, qualitative
 Zusammenfassung: Current models of aesthetic experience of music (AEM) have emerged in the recent years capitalizing on evidence from psychology and neuroscience research, thus modeling mainly cognitive and information processes in the brain. However, a large part of the empirical research on which these models are based is related to Western tonal music, while another style of Western music, namely, contemporary classical music (CCM), has been almost neglected. CCM is often dissonant and lacks a tonal hierarchical structure, as, for example, in serial musical pieces. The current study qualitatively explored aesthetic dimensions of a CCM experience by contrasting it to classic–romantic music (CM). To this end, 16 semi-structured interviews with experts of both CCM (n = 8) and CM (n = 8) were conducted. The interview guide consisted of questions relating to physiological, affective, and cognitive dimensions of music listening. We applied qualitative content analysis on the textual material and compared the emerging main and sub-themes between the groups. Our findings show that especially the categories of expectations, physiological and emotional responses, pleasurable aspects, and, lastly, existential relevance revealed striking differences which allow us to conclude that CM and CCM afford distinguishable types of AEM in listeners.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n): eng - English
 Datum: 2022-06-10
 Publikationsstatus: Online veröffentlicht
 Seiten: -
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: Expertenbegutachtung
 Identifikatoren: DOI: 10.1177/03057356221091312
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: Psychology of Music
Genre der Quelle: Zeitschrift
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage Publications [etc.]
Seiten: - Band / Heft: - Artikelnummer: - Start- / Endseite: - Identifikator: ISSN: 0305-7356
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/110978966557720