English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Whole-body sensorimotor skill learning in football players: No evidence for motor transfer effects

Maudrich, T., Kandt, H., Ragert, P., & Kenville, R. (2022). Whole-body sensorimotor skill learning in football players: No evidence for motor transfer effects. PLoS One, 17(7): e0271412. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0271412.

Item is

Basic

show hide
Genre: Journal Article

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
Maudrich_2022.pdf (Publisher version), 2MB
Name:
Maudrich_2022.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Maudrich, Tom1, 2, Author           
Kandt, Hannah1, Author
Ragert, Patrick1, 2, Author           
Kenville, Rouven1, 2, Author           
Affiliations:
1Department of Human Movement Neuroscience, Faculty of Sport Science, University of Leipzig, Germany, ou_persistent22              
2Department Neurology, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society, ou_634549              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: Besides simple movement sequences, precise whole-body motor sequences are fundamental for top athletic performance. It has long been questioned whether athletes have an advantage when learning new whole-body motor sequences. In a previous study, we did not find any superior learning or transfer effects of strength and endurance athletes in a complex whole-body serial reaction time task (CWB-SRTT). In the present study, we aimed to extend this research by increasing the overlap of task requirements between CWB-SRTT and a specific sports discipline. For this purpose, we assessed differences between football players and non-athletes during motor sequence learning using CWB-SRTT. 15 non-athletes (CG) and 16 football players (FG) performed the CWB-SRTT over 2 days separated by one week. Median reaction times and movement times were analyzed as well as differences in sequence-specific CWB-SRTT learning rates and retention. Our findings did not reveal any differences in sequence-specific or non-sequence-specific improvement, nor retention rates between CG and FG. We speculate that this might relate to a predominately cognitive-induced learning effect during CWB-SRTT which negates the assumed motor advantage of the football players.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2022-01-242022-06-292022-07-11
 Publication Status: Published online
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271412
Other: eCollection 2022
PMID: 35816510
PMC: PMC9273065
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: PLoS One
  Abbreviation : PLoS One
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 17 (7) Sequence Number: e0271412 Start / End Page: - Identifier: ISSN: 1932-6203
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/1000000000277850