English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Unequal but Just? Experimental Evidence on (Gendered) Distributive Justice Principles in Parental Financial Gifts

Tisch, D., & Gutfleisch, T. (2023). Unequal but Just? Experimental Evidence on (Gendered) Distributive Justice Principles in Parental Financial Gifts. Socio-Economic Review, 21(3), 1369-1390. doi:10.1093/ser/mwac041.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
SER_21_2023_Tisch.pdf (Any fulltext), 525KB
Name:
SER_21_2023_Tisch.pdf
Description:
Full text open access
OA-Status:
Green
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Tisch, Daria1, 2, Author           
Gutfleisch, Tamara3, 4, Author
Affiliations:
1Vermögen und soziale Ungleichheit, MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society, ou_3363007              
2Department of Social Sciences, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany, ou_persistent22              
3Mannheim Centre for European Social Research (MZES), University of Mannheim, Germany, ou_persistent22              
4Department of Social Sciences, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg, ou_persistent22              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: family economics, gender inequality, social norms, justice theory, wealth, generations
 Abstract: Research has documented gender inequalities in parental financial gifts, but it is unclear under which conditions these inequalities are socially accepted. We combine distributive justice theory with sociological and economic perspectives on intergenerational transfers to examine perceptions of fair allocations of parental gifts. By manipulating children’s characteristics in a multifactorial vignette experiment, we conducted in Germany in 2020 (N¼4284 observations of 714 respondents), we test the prevalence and gendered application of four justice principles (equality, need, entitlement and equity). While the equality principle was widespread, unequal gifts were legitimized both by children’s financial needs (unemployment) and exchange services (helping in parents’ household). These results indicate that the family is perceived as an agency for economic redistribution, potentially affecting society’s socio-economic structure. Moreover, exchange services weighed more for sons while needs weighed more for daughters, suggesting that gendered fairness perceptions are one possible mechanism explaining gender inequalities in financial gifts.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2022-07-142023
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: 1. Introduction
2. Theory and empirical background
3. Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
6. Conclusion
Acknowledgements
References
Supplementary data
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1093/ser/mwac041
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Socio-Economic Review
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 21 (3) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 1369 - 1390 Identifier: ISSN: 1475-1461
ISSN: 1475-147X