日本語
 
Help Privacy Policy ポリシー/免責事項
  詳細検索ブラウズ

アイテム詳細

 前へ次へ 
  Unequal but Just? Experimental Evidence on (Gendered) Distributive Justice Principles in Parental Financial Gifts

Tisch, D., & Gutfleisch, T. (2023). Unequal but Just? Experimental Evidence on (Gendered) Distributive Justice Principles in Parental Financial Gifts. Socio-Economic Review, 21(3), 1369-1390. doi:10.1093/ser/mwac041.

Item is

基本情報

表示: 非表示:
アイテムのパーマリンク: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000A-BB7B-A 版のパーマリンク: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000D-90CC-A
資料種別: 学術論文

ファイル

表示: ファイル
非表示: ファイル
:
SER_21_2023_Tisch.pdf (全文テキスト(全般)), 525KB
ファイルのパーマリンク:
https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000D-90CD-9
ファイル名:
SER_21_2023_Tisch.pdf
説明:
Full text open access
OA-Status:
Green
閲覧制限:
公開
MIMEタイプ / チェックサム:
application/pdf / [MD5]
技術的なメタデータ:
著作権日付:
-
著作権情報:
-
CCライセンス:
-

作成者

表示:
非表示:
 作成者:
Tisch, Daria1, 2, 著者           
Gutfleisch, Tamara3, 4, 著者
所属:
1Vermögen und soziale Ungleichheit, MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society, ou_3363007              
2Department of Social Sciences, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany, ou_persistent22              
3Mannheim Centre for European Social Research (MZES), University of Mannheim, Germany, ou_persistent22              
4Department of Social Sciences, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg, ou_persistent22              

内容説明

表示:
非表示:
キーワード: family economics, gender inequality, social norms, justice theory, wealth, generations
 要旨: Research has documented gender inequalities in parental financial gifts, but it is unclear under which conditions these inequalities are socially accepted. We combine distributive justice theory with sociological and economic perspectives on intergenerational transfers to examine perceptions of fair allocations of parental gifts. By manipulating children’s characteristics in a multifactorial vignette experiment, we conducted in Germany in 2020 (N¼4284 observations of 714 respondents), we test the prevalence and gendered application of four justice principles (equality, need, entitlement and equity). While the equality principle was widespread, unequal gifts were legitimized both by children’s financial needs (unemployment) and exchange services (helping in parents’ household). These results indicate that the family is perceived as an agency for economic redistribution, potentially affecting society’s socio-economic structure. Moreover, exchange services weighed more for sons while needs weighed more for daughters, suggesting that gendered fairness perceptions are one possible mechanism explaining gender inequalities in financial gifts.

資料詳細

表示:
非表示:
言語: eng - English
 日付: 2022-07-142023
 出版の状態: 出版
 ページ: -
 出版情報: -
 目次: 1. Introduction
2. Theory and empirical background
3. Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
6. Conclusion
Acknowledgements
References
Supplementary data
 査読: 査読あり
 識別子(DOI, ISBNなど): DOI: 10.1093/ser/mwac041
 学位: -

関連イベント

表示:

訴訟

表示:

Project information

表示:

出版物 1

表示:
非表示:
出版物名: Socio-Economic Review
種別: 学術雑誌
 著者・編者:
所属:
出版社, 出版地: -
ページ: - 巻号: 21 (3) 通巻号: - 開始・終了ページ: 1369 - 1390 識別子(ISBN, ISSN, DOIなど): ISSN: 1475-1461
ISSN: 1475-147X