Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT
  Unequal but Just? Experimental Evidence on (Gendered) Distributive Justice Principles in Parental Financial Gifts

Tisch, D., & Gutfleisch, T. (2023). Unequal but Just? Experimental Evidence on (Gendered) Distributive Justice Principles in Parental Financial Gifts. Socio-Economic Review, 21(3), 1369-1390. doi:10.1093/ser/mwac041.

Item is

Basisdaten

einblenden: ausblenden:
Genre: Zeitschriftenartikel

Dateien

einblenden: Dateien
ausblenden: Dateien
:
SER_21_2023_Tisch.pdf (beliebiger Volltext), 525KB
Name:
SER_21_2023_Tisch.pdf
Beschreibung:
Full text open access
OA-Status:
Grün
Sichtbarkeit:
Öffentlich
MIME-Typ / Prüfsumme:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technische Metadaten:
Copyright Datum:
-
Copyright Info:
-
Lizenz:
-

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Tisch, Daria1, 2, Autor           
Gutfleisch, Tamara3, 4, Autor
Affiliations:
1Vermögen und soziale Ungleichheit, MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society, ou_3363007              
2Department of Social Sciences, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany, ou_persistent22              
3Mannheim Centre for European Social Research (MZES), University of Mannheim, Germany, ou_persistent22              
4Department of Social Sciences, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg, ou_persistent22              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: family economics, gender inequality, social norms, justice theory, wealth, generations
 Zusammenfassung: Research has documented gender inequalities in parental financial gifts, but it is unclear under which conditions these inequalities are socially accepted. We combine distributive justice theory with sociological and economic perspectives on intergenerational transfers to examine perceptions of fair allocations of parental gifts. By manipulating children’s characteristics in a multifactorial vignette experiment, we conducted in Germany in 2020 (N¼4284 observations of 714 respondents), we test the prevalence and gendered application of four justice principles (equality, need, entitlement and equity). While the equality principle was widespread, unequal gifts were legitimized both by children’s financial needs (unemployment) and exchange services (helping in parents’ household). These results indicate that the family is perceived as an agency for economic redistribution, potentially affecting society’s socio-economic structure. Moreover, exchange services weighed more for sons while needs weighed more for daughters, suggesting that gendered fairness perceptions are one possible mechanism explaining gender inequalities in financial gifts.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n): eng - English
 Datum: 2022-07-142023
 Publikationsstatus: Erschienen
 Seiten: -
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: 1. Introduction
2. Theory and empirical background
3. Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
6. Conclusion
Acknowledgements
References
Supplementary data
 Art der Begutachtung: Expertenbegutachtung
 Identifikatoren: DOI: 10.1093/ser/mwac041
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: Socio-Economic Review
Genre der Quelle: Zeitschrift
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
Seiten: - Band / Heft: 21 (3) Artikelnummer: - Start- / Endseite: 1369 - 1390 Identifikator: ISSN: 1475-1461
ISSN: 1475-147X