Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT
  Towards a simple mathematical model for the legal concept of balancing of interests

Zufall, F., Kimura, R., & Peng, L. (2022). Towards a simple mathematical model for the legal concept of balancing of interests. Artificial Intelligence and Law. doi:10.1007/s10506-022-09338-3.

Item is

Basisdaten

einblenden: ausblenden:
Genre: Zeitschriftenartikel

Dateien

einblenden: Dateien
ausblenden: Dateien
:
Towards a simple mathematical model for the legal concept of balancing of interests.pdf (Verlagsversion), 2MB
Name:
Towards a simple mathematical model for the legal concept of balancing of interests.pdf
Beschreibung:
-
OA-Status:
Hybrid
Sichtbarkeit:
Öffentlich
MIME-Typ / Prüfsumme:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technische Metadaten:
Copyright Datum:
-
Copyright Info:
-

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Zufall, Frederike1, Autor           
Kimura, Rampei, Autor
Peng, Linyu, Autor
Affiliations:
1Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Society, ou_2173688              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: balancing of interests, legal criteria, mathematical modeling, mathematical optimisation, protection of information
 Zusammenfassung: We propose simple nonlinear mathematical models for the legal concept of balancing of interests. Our aim is to bridge the gap between an abstract formalisation of a balancing decision while assuring consistency and ultimately legal certainty across cases. We focus on the conflict between the rights to privacy and to the protection of personal data in Art. 7 and Art. 8 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights (EUCh) against the right of access to information derived from Art. 11 EUCh. These competing rights are denoted by (i1) right to privacy and (i2) access to information; mathematically, their indices are respectively assigned by u1 ∈ [0, 1] and u2 ∈ [0, 1] subject to the constraint u1 + u2 = 1. This constraint allows us to use one single index u to resolve the conflict through balancing. The outcome will be concluded by comparing the index u with a prior given threshold u0. For simplicity, we assume that the balancing depends on only selected legal criteria such as the social status of affected person, and the sphere from which the information originated, which are represented as inputs of the models, called legal parameters. Additionally, we take “time” into consideration as a legal criterion, building on the European Court of Justice’s ruling on the right to be forgotten: by considering time as a legal parameter, we model how the outcome of the balancing changes over the passage of time. To catch the dependence of the outcome u by these criteria as legal parameters, data were created by a fully-qualified lawyer. By comparison to other approaches based on machine learning, especially neural networks, this approach requires significantly less data. This might come at the price of higher abstraction and simplification, but also provides for higher transparency and explainability. Two mathematical models for u, a time-independent model and a time-dependent model, are proposed, that are fitted by using the data.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n):
 Datum: 2022-11-08
 Publikationsstatus: Online veröffentlicht
 Seiten: -
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: Expertenbegutachtung
 Identifikatoren: DOI: 10.1007/s10506-022-09338-3
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: Artificial Intelligence and Law
Genre der Quelle: Zeitschrift
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: Springer nature
Seiten: - Band / Heft: - Artikelnummer: - Start- / Endseite: - Identifikator: -