English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  The Aesthetic Responsiveness Assessment (AReA) in Farsi language: A scale validation and cultural adaptation study.

Golbabaei, S., Christensen, J. F., Vessel, E. A., Kazemian, N., & Borhani, K. (2022). The Aesthetic Responsiveness Assessment (AReA) in Farsi language: A scale validation and cultural adaptation study. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/aca0000532.

Item is

Files

show Files

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Golbabaei, Soroosh1, Author
Christensen, Julia F.2, Author                 
Vessel, Edward Allen3, Author                 
Kazemian, Nastaran1, Author
Borhani, Khatereh1, Author
Affiliations:
1Institute for Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Teheran, Iran, ou_persistent22              
2Department of Language and Literature, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Max Planck Society, ou_2421695              
3Department of Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Max Planck Society, ou_2421697              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: *Aesthetics, *Discriminant Validity, *Measurement, *Test Validity, *Cross Cultural Test Adaptation, Construct Validity, Convergent Validity, Internal Consistency, Test Construction
 Abstract: People differ in their responsiveness to aesthetic experiences. It is important to understand the role of culture in such individual differences, yet existing tools for assessing aesthetic responsiveness largely focus on North American and European cultures. We created a Farsi translated and culturally adapted version of the Aesthetic Responsiveness Assessment (AReA) and evaluated its psychometric properties. Construct validity and internal consistency were evaluated in a sample of 1,586 participants. Moreover, convergent and discriminant validity were investigated using the Behavioral Avoidance/Inhibition Scales (BIS-BAS), Big Five Inventory-2, Barcelona Music Reward Questionnaire (BMRQ), and the Temporal Experience of Pleasure Scale (TEPS). Further, the test–retest reliability of AReA was examined for the first time in a subsample of participants (n = 160) who answered the questionnaire again after 6 months. In addition to an acceptable structural validity (comparative fit index, CFI = .905), the Farsi version of AReA showed good internal consistency. Cronbach’s α for the overall score was .848 and varied between .64 and .81 for subscales. Concerning convergent and discriminant validity, AReA subscales were positively correlated with subscales of TEPS, the Emotion Evocation subscale of BMRQ, Behavioral Avoidance, and Openness, and were unrelated to Behavioral Inhibition, Conscientiousness, and Negative Emotionality. Moreover, AReA subscales showed different patterns of correlations with other questionnaires. Finally, all subscales of AReA showed high test–retest reliability, ranging from .715 to .778. Our results confirm the validity of the Farsi version of AReA and provide a new measure of aesthetic responsiveness, useful in Farsi-speaking communities, which facilitates cross-cultural research in empirical aesthetics. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2022-11-04
 Publication Status: Published online
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1037/aca0000532
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. Advance online publication
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: US : Educational Publishing Foundation
Pages: - Volume / Issue: - Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: - Identifier: ISBN: 1931-390X(Electronic),1931-3896(Print)