English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Sublinear Algorithms for (1.5+Epsilon)-Approximate Matching

Bhattacharya, S., Kiss, P., & Saranurak, T. (2022). Sublinear Algorithms for (1.5+Epsilon)-Approximate Matching. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.00189.

Item is

Basic

show hide
Genre: Paper
Latex : Sublinear Algorithms for $(1.5+\epsilon)$-Approximate Matching
Other : Sublinear Algorithms for (1.5+E)-Approximate Matching

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
arXiv:2212.00189.pdf (Preprint), 445KB
Name:
arXiv:2212.00189.pdf
Description:
File downloaded from arXiv at 2023-01-09 09:00
OA-Status:
Not specified
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Bhattacharya, Sayan1, Author           
Kiss, Peter2, Author
Saranurak, Thatchaphol1, Author           
Affiliations:
1External Organizations, ou_persistent22              
2Algorithms and Complexity, MPI for Informatics, Max Planck Society, ou_24019              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: Computer Science, Data Structures and Algorithms, cs.DS
 Abstract: We study sublinear time algorithms for estimating the size of maximum
matching. After a long line of research, the problem was finally settled by
Behnezhad [FOCS'22], in the regime where one is willing to pay an approximation
factor of $2$. Very recently, Behnezhad et al.[SODA'23] improved the
approximation factor to $(2-\frac{1}{2^{O(1/\gamma)}})$ using $n^{1+\gamma}$
time. This improvement over the factor $2$ is, however, minuscule and they
asked if even $1.99$-approximation is possible in $n^{2-\Omega(1)}$ time. We
give a strong affirmative answer to this open problem by showing
$(1.5+\epsilon)$-approximation algorithms that run in
$n^{2-\Theta(\epsilon^{2})}$ time. Our approach is conceptually simple and
diverges from all previous sublinear-time matching algorithms: we show a
sublinear time algorithm for computing a variant of the edge-degree constrained
subgraph (EDCS), a concept that has previously been exploited in dynamic
[Bernstein Stein ICALP'15, SODA'16], distributed [Assadi et al. SODA'19] and
streaming [Bernstein ICALP'20] settings, but never before in the sublinear
setting. Independent work: Behnezhad, Roghani and Rubinstein [BRR'23]
independently showed sublinear algorithms similar to our Theorem 1.2 in both
adjacency list and matrix models. Furthermore, in [BRR'23], they show
additional results on strictly better-than-1.5 approximate matching algorithms
in both upper and lower bound sides.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2022-11-302022
 Publication Status: Published online
 Pages: 28 p.
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: arXiv: 2212.00189
URI: https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.00189
BibTex Citekey: Bhattacharya2212.00189
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source

show