English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  The Politics of University Rankings in China

Ahlers, A. L., & Christmann-Budian, S. (2023). The Politics of University Rankings in China. Higher Education. doi:10.1007/s10734-023-01014-y.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
s10734-023-01014-y.pdf (Publisher version), 807KB
Name:
s10734-023-01014-y.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Gold
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-

Locators

show
hide
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Not specified

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Ahlers, Anna L.1, Author                 
Christmann-Budian, Stephanie, Author
Affiliations:
1Lise Meitner Research Group China in the Global System of Science, Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Max Planck Society, ou_3194853              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: University rankings, China, Science Policy, Higher education policy, Performance evaluation, Quantification
 Abstract: Over the past decade, universities in the People’s Republic of China have notably progressed in international rankings. Most of the existing literature interested in this development describes the adoption of university rankings in China as a recent import of a global institution, and as being driven by a governmental agenda that seeks to bolster the country’s competitiveness and overall status on the world stage, including in the academic realm. The wider domestic environment that determines Chinese universities’ participation in the global ranking competition is usually left out of the picture. As this article demonstrates, university rankings and other performance indicators have been an organic part of Chinese science and higher education policy and a prominent element in state-directed national reform and development planning processes since at least the 1980s. In addition to the crucial role of the state and a lack of university autonomy, what further distinguishes the case of China from other countries in the rankings is a strong and accepted tradition of utilizing quantification, competition, and rating as political tools. Another reason, we argue, why Chinese universities were able to insert themselves into the ranking race relatively seamlessly and with some quick successes. Yet, after decades of following so-called “Western” standards and indicators for academic performance and reputation evaluation, domestic policy is changing again and taking a seemingly nationalist turn which may bring about some changes in the practice and significance of university rankings in China—and potentially beyond, as we discuss in conclusion.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2023-04-04
 Publication Status: Published online
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1007/s10734-023-01014-y
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Higher Education
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Springer
Pages: - Volume / Issue: - Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: - Identifier: ISSN: 0018-1560