Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT
  Supranational Modernisation or National Partisanship? Explaining Variation in Recovery and Resilience Plans in Central and Eastern Europe

Simons, J. P., & Oellerich, N. (2023). Supranational Modernisation or National Partisanship? Explaining Variation in Recovery and Resilience Plans in Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of European Public Policy. doi:10.1080/13501763.2023.2231029.

Item is

Basisdaten

einblenden: ausblenden:
Genre: Zeitschriftenartikel

Dateien

einblenden: Dateien
ausblenden: Dateien
:
mpifg_zs23_0307.pdf (beliebiger Volltext), 3MB
 
Datei-Permalink:
-
Name:
mpifg_zs23_0307.pdf
Beschreibung:
Full text
OA-Status:
Sichtbarkeit:
Eingeschränkt (Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, MKGS; )
MIME-Typ / Prüfsumme:
application/pdf
Technische Metadaten:
Copyright Datum:
-
Copyright Info:
-
Lizenz:
-

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:
ausblenden:
externe Referenz:
https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2231029 (Verlagsversion)
Beschreibung:
Full text open access via publisher
OA-Status:
Hybrid

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Simons, Jasper P.1, 2, Autor                 
Oellerich, Nils3, Autor
Affiliations:
1Politische Ökonomie, MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society, ou_3363015              
2European Studies Department, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands, ou_persistent22              
3Department of Political and Social Sciences, European University Institute, Florence, Italy, ou_persistent22              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: Recovery and Resilience Facility; political economy; Europeanisation; partisanship; Centraland Eastern Europe
 Zusammenfassung: The European Union’s Recovery and Resilience Facility is an unprecedented investment opportunity for economic modernisation. However, while the supranational European Commission assumes considerable influence over the design of national Recovery and Resilience Plans (RRPs), there is substantial diversity among RRPs. This paper analyses the interaction between national governments and the Commission in the coordinative RRP design process. We argue that national policy preferences, rooted in the partisan profiles of governing coalitions, ultimately explain variation in RRP content. We analyse the policymaking process in three semi-peripheral economies in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) – Estonia, Romania, and Slovakia. CEE countries are especially suitable because as expected rule-takers, they function as least likely cases for the relevance of government agency, i.e., national partisanship. Through elite interviews, we trace various elements of each RRP to specific positions of governing coalitions and, with national variation, the Commission’s ability to impose its own policy preferences.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n): eng - English
 Datum: 2022-12-302023-06-252023-07-03
 Publikationsstatus: Online veröffentlicht
 Seiten: 27
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: Introduction
Theoretical framework
Research design and outcome of interest
Case explanations
Conclusion
Acknowledgements
Disclosure statement
Additional information
Footnotes
References
Appendixes
 Art der Begutachtung: Expertenbegutachtung
 Identifikatoren: DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2023.2231029
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: Journal of European Public Policy
Genre der Quelle: Zeitschrift
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
Seiten: - Band / Heft: - Artikelnummer: - Start- / Endseite: - Identifikator: ISSN: 1350-1763
ISSN: 1466-4429