日本語
 
Help Privacy Policy ポリシー/免責事項
  詳細検索ブラウズ

アイテム詳細

  Supranational Modernisation or National Partisanship? Explaining Variation in Recovery and Resilience Plans in Central and Eastern Europe

Simons, J. P., & Oellerich, N. (2023). Supranational Modernisation or National Partisanship? Explaining Variation in Recovery and Resilience Plans in Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of European Public Policy. doi:10.1080/13501763.2023.2231029.

Item is

基本情報

表示: 非表示:
アイテムのパーマリンク: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000D-697A-5 版のパーマリンク: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000D-6E19-D
資料種別: 学術論文

ファイル

表示: ファイル
非表示: ファイル
:
mpifg_zs23_0307.pdf (全文テキスト(全般)), 3MB
 
ファイルのパーマリンク:
-
ファイル名:
mpifg_zs23_0307.pdf
説明:
Full text
OA-Status:
閲覧制限:
制限付き (Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, MKGS; )
MIMEタイプ / チェックサム:
application/pdf
技術的なメタデータ:
著作権日付:
-
著作権情報:
-
CCライセンス:
-

関連URL

表示:
非表示:
説明:
Full text open access via publisher
OA-Status:
Hybrid

作成者

表示:
非表示:
 作成者:
Simons, Jasper P.1, 2, 著者                 
Oellerich, Nils3, 著者
所属:
1Politische Ökonomie, MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society, ou_3363015              
2European Studies Department, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands, ou_persistent22              
3Department of Political and Social Sciences, European University Institute, Florence, Italy, ou_persistent22              

内容説明

表示:
非表示:
キーワード: Recovery and Resilience Facility; political economy; Europeanisation; partisanship; Centraland Eastern Europe
 要旨: The European Union’s Recovery and Resilience Facility is an unprecedented investment opportunity for economic modernisation. However, while the supranational European Commission assumes considerable influence over the design of national Recovery and Resilience Plans (RRPs), there is substantial diversity among RRPs. This paper analyses the interaction between national governments and the Commission in the coordinative RRP design process. We argue that national policy preferences, rooted in the partisan profiles of governing coalitions, ultimately explain variation in RRP content. We analyse the policymaking process in three semi-peripheral economies in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) – Estonia, Romania, and Slovakia. CEE countries are especially suitable because as expected rule-takers, they function as least likely cases for the relevance of government agency, i.e., national partisanship. Through elite interviews, we trace various elements of each RRP to specific positions of governing coalitions and, with national variation, the Commission’s ability to impose its own policy preferences.

資料詳細

表示:
非表示:
言語: eng - English
 日付: 2022-12-302023-06-252023-07-03
 出版の状態: オンラインで出版済み
 ページ: 27
 出版情報: -
 目次: Introduction
Theoretical framework
Research design and outcome of interest
Case explanations
Conclusion
Acknowledgements
Disclosure statement
Additional information
Footnotes
References
Appendixes
 査読: 査読あり
 識別子(DOI, ISBNなど): DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2023.2231029
 学位: -

関連イベント

表示:

訴訟

表示:

Project information

表示:

出版物 1

表示:
非表示:
出版物名: Journal of European Public Policy
種別: 学術雑誌
 著者・編者:
所属:
出版社, 出版地: -
ページ: - 巻号: - 通巻号: - 開始・終了ページ: - 識別子(ISBN, ISSN, DOIなど): ISSN: 1350-1763
ISSN: 1466-4429