English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Sorting out Journals: The Proliferation of Journal Lists in China

Wang, J., Halffman, W., & Zhang, Y. H. (2023). Sorting out Journals: The Proliferation of Journal Lists in China. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 74(10), 1207-1228. doi:10.1002/asi.24816.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
Asso for Info Science Tech - 2023 - Wang - Sorting out journals The proliferation of journal lists in China.pdf (Any fulltext), 2MB
Name:
Asso for Info Science Tech - 2023 - Wang - Sorting out journals The proliferation of journal lists in China.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Gold
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-

Locators

show
hide
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Not specified

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Wang, Jing1, Author           
Halffman, Willem, Author
Zhang, Yuehong Helen, Author
Affiliations:
1Lise Meitner Research Group China in the Global System of Science, Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Max Planck Society, ou_3194853              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: Journal lists are instruments to categorize, compare, and assess research and scholarly publications. Our study investigates the remarkable proliferation of such journal lists in China, analyses their underlying values, quality criteria and ranking principles, and specifies how concerns specific to the Chinese research policy and publishing system inform these lists. Discouraged lists of “bad journals” reflect concerns over inferior research publications, but also the involved drain on public resources. Endorsed lists of “good journals” are based on criteria valued in research policy, reflecting the distinctive administrative logic of state-led Chinese research and publishing policy, ascribing worth to scientific journals for its specific national and institutional needs. In this regard, the criteria used for journal list construction are contextual and reflect the challenges of public resource allocation in a market-led publication system. Chinese journal lists therefore reflect research policy changes, such as a shift away from output-dominated research evaluation, the specific concerns about research misconduct, and balancing national research needs against international standards, resulting in distinctly Chinese quality criteria. However, contrasting concerns and inaccuracies lead to contradictions in the “qualify” and “disqualify” binary logic and demonstrate inherent tensions and limitations in journal lists as policy tools.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2023-07-132023-10
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1002/asi.24816
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Wiley
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 74 (10) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 1207 - 1228 Identifier: ISSN: 2330-1635