Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT
  Biodiversity and pandemics: interdisciplinary research and action priorities ; a report of the Eklipse Expert Working Group on biodiversity and pandemics

Jagadesh, S., Caron, A., Lajaunie, C., Turan, H. M., Bunnefeld, N., Cunningham, A., et al.(2023). Biodiversity and pandemics: interdisciplinary research and action priorities; a report of the Eklipse Expert Working Group on biodiversity and pandemics (gea0088). doi:10.5281/zenodo.10039876.

Item is

Basisdaten

einblenden: ausblenden:
Genre: Bericht
Andere : A draft report of the Eklipse Expert Working Group on biodiversity and pandemics [preprint title]

Dateien

einblenden: Dateien
ausblenden: Dateien
:
gea0088.pdf (Verlagsversion), 3MB
 
Datei-Permalink:
-
Name:
gea0088.pdf
Beschreibung:
-
OA-Status:
Sichtbarkeit:
Privat
MIME-Typ / Prüfsumme:
application/pdf
Technische Metadaten:
Copyright Datum:
-
Copyright Info:
-
Lizenz:
-
:
gea0088pre.pdf (Preprint), 4MB
 
Datei-Permalink:
-
Name:
gea0088pre.pdf
Beschreibung:
-
OA-Status:
Sichtbarkeit:
Privat
MIME-Typ / Prüfsumme:
application/pdf
Technische Metadaten:
Copyright Datum:
-
Copyright Info:
-
Lizenz:
-

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:
ausblenden:
externe Referenz:
access via Website (Verlagsversion)
Beschreibung:
pdf. - (last seen: Feb. 2024)
OA-Status:
Sonstiges
externe Referenz:
access via Website (Preprint)
Beschreibung:
pdf. - (last seen: Feb. 2024)
OA-Status:
Sonstiges

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Jagadesh, Soushieta, Autor
Caron, Alexandre, Autor
Lajaunie, Claire, Autor
Turan, Hatice Mahur, Autor
Bunnefeld, Nils, Autor
Cunningham, Andrew, Autor
Fernandez, Miguel, Autor
Scott, Alister, Autor
Tchiadje, Norbert Tchouaffe, Autor
Izdebski, Adam1, Autor                 
Shapiro, Julie Teresa, Autor
Affiliations:
1Palaeo-Science and History Independent Group (PS&H), Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology, Max Planck Society, ou_3523866              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: -
 Zusammenfassung: The Expert Working Group (EWG) established by Eklipse in June 2022 worked for a year and undertook a number of different studies aimed at synthesising the current state of knowledge on biodiversity and pandemics. The group consisted of scientists with relevant expertise in the natural, biomedical and social sciences. The EWG focused on identifying and prioritising research gaps, while also collecting evidence on, and validating policy recommendations for, the interface of biodiversity and pandemics.
The main finding is the need for a transdisciplinary scientific approach at the interface of human/anthropogenic and natural/wild environments, combining on equal terms the social and natural science methods and insights. While the broad knowledge of ecology and other relevant natural science disciplines is crucial, a comprehensive study and understanding of human-biodiversity interfaces and their drivers is not possible without social sciences, e.g. anthropology, sociology, political science, economics, history, archaeology, playing a major and autonomous role.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n): eng - English
 Datum: 2023-10
 Publikationsstatus: Online veröffentlicht
 Seiten: 107
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: 1. Executive summary
2. Introduction
2.1 Background
2.2 Preparatory work undertaken by Eklipse prior to the Expert working Group
2.3 a cross-sectoral consortium of requesters
2.4 Final formulation of the request
2.5 The Expert Working Group on Biodiversity and Pandemics
2.6 Objectives of the request
3. Methodological framework: background and objectives
3.1 Literature-based method: Scoping review
3.1.1 Description of the method
3.1.2 Search strategy
3.1.3 Article screening
3.1.4 Data extraction
3.1.5 Data synthesis
3.1.6 Data visualisation
3.1.7 Approach to organise Knowledge and Data
3.2 Initiatives–based method: Initiatives scoping
3.3 People-based methods: online survey and online focus group discussion
3.3.1 Description of the method based on the preliminary results of the
scoping review
3.4 Limitations and changes to the original methodology protocol
4. Results
4.1 Literature-based method: Scoping review
4.2 Initiatives-based method: Initiatives scoping
4.2.1 Research Funding
4.2.2 Open Calls
4.2.3 Thematic Calls
4.2.4 Surveillance Networks
4.2.5 Preparedness and / or Implementation Funding
4.2.6 Conservation Initiatives
4.2.7 Relevant European Agencies
4.2.8 Limitations
4.3 People-based methods: Online survey and online focus group discussion
4.3.1 Online survey
4.3.2 Focus group discussion
5. Discussion and recommendations
6. Conclusion
 Art der Begutachtung: -
 Identifikatoren: DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10039876
URN: https://eklipse.eu/request-biodiversity-pandemics/
Anderer: gea0088
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: eklipse
Genre der Quelle: Webseite
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
Seiten: - Band / Heft: Eklipse Report Artikelnummer: 02/2023 Start- / Endseite: - Identifikator: URI: https://eklipse.eu/