English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Assessing adverse effects and unspecific effects of transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS)

Zhao, H., Horn, U., Freund, M., Bujanow, A., Gundlach, C., Hartwigsen, G., et al. (2023). Assessing adverse effects and unspecific effects of transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS). bioRxiv. doi:10.1101/2023.12.14.571694.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
Zhao_pre.pdf (Preprint), 2MB
Name:
Zhao_pre.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Green
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Zhao, Hongyan1, Author           
Horn, Ulrike1, Author                 
Freund, Melanie, Author
Bujanow, Anna2, Author           
Gundlach, Christopher3, Author           
Hartwigsen, Gesa4, Author                 
Eippert, Falk1, Author                 
Affiliations:
1Max Planck Research Group Pain Perception, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society, ou_2497695              
2Methods and Development Unit Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society, ou_634558              
3Department Neurology, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society, ou_634549              
4Lise Meitner Research Group Cognition and Plasticity, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society, ou_3025665              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: Background Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) is a relatively recent method for non-invasively modulating neuronal activity in the human spinal cord. Despite its growing prominence, comprehensive studies addressing its potential adverse effects (AEs) and unspecific effects (UEs) are lacking.

Objective In this study, we conducted a systematic investigation into the potential AEs and UEs of tsDCS in healthy volunteers.

Methods We used a randomized double-blind within-participant design, employing anodal, cathodal and sham tsDCS of the thoracolumbar spinal cord. Our approach involved a newly-developed structured questionnaire (to assess subjectively-reported AEs) in combination with tsDCS-concurrent recording of skin conductance, cardiac and respiratory activity (to assess UEs in bodily state).

Results The most frequently participant-reported AEs were sensations of burning, tingling, and itching, although they were largely described as mild; skin redness (experimenter-reported) occurred even more frequently. Importantly, when comparing AEs between active and sham tsDCS via frequentist and Bayesian analysis approaches, the results were largely in favour of no difference between conditions (with the exception of skin redness). A similar picture emerged for most UE metrics, suggesting that tsDCS does not induce changes in bodily state, at least as measured by our autonomic nervous system metrics.

Conclusion We believe that the strategy employed here could serve as a starting point for a systematic AE and UE assessment in clinical populations, longitudinal designs and when stimulating different spinal sites. Taken together, our results contribute to assessing the tolerability, safety and specificity of tsDCS, in order to further the investigation of spinal cord function in health and disease.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2023-12-14
 Publication Status: Published online
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1101/2023.12.14.571694
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: bioRxiv
Source Genre: Web Page
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: - Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: - Identifier: -