English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  The Critique of Digital Constitutionalism

Golia, A. J. (2022). The Critique of Digital Constitutionalism. MPIL Research Paper Series, 2022-13. doi:10.2139/ssrn.4145813.

Item is

Files

show Files

Locators

show
hide
Locator:
http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4145813 (Any fulltext)
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Not specified

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Golia, Angelo Jr1, Author           
Affiliations:
1Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law, Max Planck Society, ou_3029158              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: digital constitutionalism, constitutional theory, societal constitutionalism, legal pluralism, systems theory, liberal constitutionalism, critical theory, digital platforms, surveillance capitalism, platform economy, content moderation, Oversight Board
 Abstract: This article analyses the critical potential of digital constitutionalism using the instruments provided by societal constitutionalism. The central argument is that, in order to address the challenges posed by new technologies, digital constitutionalism should embrace a more explicitly critical discourse, questioning several assumptions of liberal, state-centred constitutional theory. Digital constitutionalism could then be framed as a theory for the digital age and as an opportunity for a reckoning with the inner contradictions of modern constitutional theory. This article has three goals. First, linking different discourses within digital constitutionalism while highlighting its own critical potential. Second, offering some preliminary proposals based on such reflection. Third, bringing digital constitutionalism closer to the broader galaxy of global constitutionalism. After the introduction, section II offers an overview of societal constitutionalism, highlighting the elements of critique toward liberal, state-centred constitutionalism. Section III reconciles societal constitutionalism and digital constitutionalism, focusing on the latter’s definition and three functionally differentiated systems: politics, economy, law. For each of them, it highlights analytical and normative gains and points at proposals to be further developed. Section IV concludes.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2022-03-212023-09-062022-06-24
 Publication Status: Published online
 Pages: 31
 Publishing info: SSRN
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4145813
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: MPIL Research Paper Series
  Alternative Title : Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law Research Paper Series
Source Genre: Series
 Creator(s):
Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law, Max Planck Society, Editor              
Affiliations:
-
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: - Sequence Number: 2022-13 Start / End Page: - Identifier: -