Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT
  Genetic effects on variability in visual aesthetic evaluations are partially shared across visual domains

Bignardi, G., Smit, D. J. A., Vessel, E. A., Trupp, M. D., Ticini, L. F., Fisher, S. E., et al. (2024). Genetic effects on variability in visual aesthetic evaluations are partially shared across visual domains. Communications Biology, 7: 55. doi:10.1038/s42003-023-05710-4.

Item is

Basisdaten

einblenden: ausblenden:
Genre: Zeitschriftenartikel

Dateien

einblenden: Dateien
ausblenden: Dateien
:
neu-24-ves-01-genetic.pdf (Verlagsversion), 2MB
Name:
neu-24-ves-01-genetic.pdf
Beschreibung:
OA
OA-Status:
Gold
Sichtbarkeit:
Öffentlich
MIME-Typ / Prüfsumme:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technische Metadaten:
Copyright Datum:
2024
Copyright Info:
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Bignardi, Giacomo1, 2, Autor
Smit, Dirk J. A.3, Autor
Vessel, Edward Allen4, 5, Autor                 
Trupp, MacKenzie D.6, 7, Autor
Ticini, Luca F.8, Autor
Fisher, Simon E.1, 9, Autor
Polderman, Tinca J. C.10, 11, Autor
Affiliations:
1Language and Genetics Department, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics , Nijmegen, the Netherlands, ou_persistent22              
2Max Planck School of Cognition, Max Planck Schools, Max Planck Society, ou_3473635              
3Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, ou_persistent22              
4Department of Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Max Planck Society, ou_2421697              
5Department of Psychology, City College, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA, ou_persistent22              
6Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center , Nijmegen, The Netherlands, ou_persistent22              
7Department of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods in Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, ou_persistent22              
8Department of Psychology, Webster Vienna Private University, Vienna, Austria, ou_persistent22              
9Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, ou_persistent22              
10Clinical Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, , Amsterdam, The Netherlands , ou_persistent22              
11VKC Psyche, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychosocial Care, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, ou_persistent22              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: Behavioural genetics, Human behaviour
 Zusammenfassung: The aesthetic values that individuals place on visual images are formed and shaped over a lifetime. However, whether the formation of visual aesthetic value is solely influenced by environmental exposure is still a matter of debate. Here, we considered differences in aesthetic value emerging across three visual domains: abstract images, scenes, and faces. We examined variability in two major dimensions of ordinary aesthetic experiences: taste-typicality and evaluation-bias. We build on two samples from the Australian Twin Registry where 1547 and 1231 monozygotic and dizygotic twins originally rated visual images belonging to the three domains. Genetic influences explained 26% to 41% of the variance in taste-typicality and evaluation-bias. Multivariate analyses showed that genetic effects were partially shared across visual domains. Results indicate that the heritability of major dimensions of aesthetic evaluations is comparable to that of other complex social traits, albeit lower than for other complex cognitive traits. The exception was taste-typicality for abstract images, for which we found only shared and unique environmental influences. Our study reveals that diverse sources of genetic and environmental variation influence the formation of aesthetic value across distinct visual domains and provides improved metrics to assess inter-individual differences in aesthetic value.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n): eng - English
 Datum: 2023-04-062023-12-142024-01-06
 Publikationsstatus: Online veröffentlicht
 Seiten: -
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: Expertenbegutachtung
 Identifikatoren: DOI: 10.1038/s42003-023-05710-4
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: Communications Biology
  Kurztitel : Commun. Biol.
Genre der Quelle: Zeitschrift
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: London : Springer Nature
Seiten: - Band / Heft: 7 Artikelnummer: 55 Start- / Endseite: - Identifikator: ISSN: 2399-3642
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/2399-3642