English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  No evidence for synchronization of the solar cycle by a "clock"

Weisshaar, E., Cameron, R. H., & Schüssler, M. (2023). No evidence for synchronization of the solar cycle by a "clock". Astronomy and Astrophysics, 671, A87. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244997.

Item is

Files

show Files

Locators

show
hide
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Not specified

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Weisshaar, E., Author
Cameron, R. H.1, Author           
Schüssler, M.2, Author           
Affiliations:
1Department Solar and Stellar Interiors, Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research, Max Planck Society, ou_1832287              
2Department Sun and Heliosphere, Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research, Max Planck Society, ou_1832289              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: Sun: activity; Sun: general; methods: statistical; dynamo; Astrophysics - Solar and Stellar Astrophysics; Astrophysics - Earth and Planetary Astrophysics; Physics - Space Physics
 Abstract: The length of the solar activity cycle fluctuates considerably. The temporal evolution of the corresponding cycle phase, that is, the deviation of the epochs of activity minima or maxima from strict periodicity, provides relevant information concerning the physical mechanism underlying the cyclic magnetic activity. An underlying strictly periodic process (akin to a perfect "clock"), with the observer seeing a superposition of the perfect clock and a small random phase perturbation, leads to long-term phase stability in the observations. Such behavior would be expected if cycles were synchronized by tides caused by orbiting planets or by a hypothetical torsional oscillation in the solar radiative interior. Alternatively, in the absence of such synchronization, phase fluctuations accumulate and a random walk of the phase ensues, which is a typical property of randomly perturbed dynamo models. Based on the sunspot record and the reconstruction of solar cycles from cosmogenic 14C, we carried out rigorous statistical tests in order to decipher whether there exists phase synchronization or random walk. Synchronization is rejected at significance levels of between 95% (28 cycles from sunspot data) and beyond 99% (84 cycles reconstructed from 14C), while the existence of random walk in the phases is consistent with all data sets. This result strongly supports randomly perturbed dynamo models with little inter-cycle memory.

Details

show
hide
Language(s):
 Dates: 2023
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244997
ISSN: 0004-6361
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Astronomy and Astrophysics
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 671 Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: A87 Identifier: -