Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Why do autocracies enfranchise their citizens abroad? A large-N event history analysis, 1990–2010

Fliess, N., Kiani, A., & Østergaard-Nielsen, E. (2024). Why do autocracies enfranchise their citizens abroad? A large-N event history analysis, 1990–2010. Democratization, 1-25. doi:10.1080/13510347.2024.2383795.

Item is

Basisdaten

einblenden: ausblenden:
Genre: Zeitschriftenartikel

Dateien

einblenden: Dateien
ausblenden: Dateien
:
OA_Fliess_2024_WhyDoAutocracies.pdf (Verlagsversion), 2MB
Name:
OA_Fliess_2024_WhyDoAutocracies.pdf
Beschreibung:
-
OA-Status:
Hybrid
Sichtbarkeit:
Öffentlich
MIME-Typ / Prüfsumme:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technische Metadaten:
Copyright Datum:
-
Copyright Info:
-

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:
ausblenden:
externe Referenz:
https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2024.2383795 (Verlagsversion)
Beschreibung:
-
OA-Status:
Hybrid

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Fliess, Nicolas1, Autor                 
Kiani, Ali, Autor
Østergaard-Nielsen, Eva, Autor
Affiliations:
1Socio-Cultural Diversity, MPI for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity, Max Planck Society, ou_1116555              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: Diaspora; autocracies; external voting; enfranchisement; elections
 Zusammenfassung: Autocratic ruling elites allow elections as a survival strategy. Many authoritarian regimes have taken this tactic one step further, also inviting their diaspora to vote from afar. This may seem puzzling given that elections abroad are difficult to control and provide a platform for exiled regime critics. So far, however, the reasons for autocracies to grant their diaspora voting rights have rarely been explored. In this article, we address this shortcoming. We employ a cross-national, autocratic regime dataset and a discrete-time event history model. We argue that autocracies use diaspora suffrage to repress and co-opt their citizens abroad while legitimizing their rule domestically and internationally. Autocrats are risk-averse and the decision to enfranchise hinges on the characteristics of the diaspora and the regime’s need for legitimacy, repression and co-optation after power transitions. We substantiate these claims by demonstrating that autocrats are less likely to enfranchise a diaspora that largely resides in democracies or consists of refugees in democracies. In turn, successful coups render diaspora suffrage adoption more probable. In sum, external voting rights present a critical case to better understand why authoritarian states adopt democratic institutions and wish to connect with their internationally mobile population.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n): eng - English
 Datum: 2024-08-22
 Publikationsstatus: Online veröffentlicht
 Seiten: -
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: Expertenbegutachtung
 Identifikatoren: DOI: 10.1080/13510347.2024.2383795
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: Democratization
Genre der Quelle: Zeitschrift
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
Seiten: 25 Band / Heft: - Artikelnummer: - Start- / Endseite: 1 - 25 Identifikator: -