English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Flow Matching for Atmospheric Retrieval of Exoplanets: Where Reliability meets Adaptive Noise Levels

Gebhard, T. D., Wildberger, J., Dax, M., Kofler, A., Angerhausen, D., Quanz, S. P., et al. (2025). Flow Matching for Atmospheric Retrieval of Exoplanets: Where Reliability meets Adaptive Noise Levels. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 693: A42. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451861.

Item is

Files

hide Files
:
2410.21477.pdf (Preprint), 7MB
Name:
2410.21477.pdf
Description:
File downloaded from arXiv at 2025-01-16 11:22
OA-Status:
Green
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
:
aa51861-24.pdf (Publisher version), 8MB
Name:
aa51861-24.pdf
Description:
Open Access
OA-Status:
Hybrid
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-

Locators

show

Creators

hide
 Creators:
Gebhard, Timothy D., Author
Wildberger, Jonas, Author
Dax, Maximilian, Author
Kofler , Annalena1, Author
Angerhausen, Daniel, Author
Quanz, Sascha P., Author
Schölkopf, Bernhard, Author
Affiliations:
1AEI-Golm, MPI for Gravitational Physics, Max Planck Society, Golm, DE, ou_24008              

Content

hide
Free keywords: Astrophysics, Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics, astro-ph.IM, Astrophysics, Earth and Planetary Astrophysics, astro-ph.EP,Computer Science, Learning, cs.LG
 Abstract: Inferring atmospheric properties of exoplanets from observed spectra is key
to understanding their formation, evolution, and habitability. Since
traditional Bayesian approaches to atmospheric retrieval (e.g., nested
sampling) are computationally expensive, a growing number of machine learning
(ML) methods such as neural posterior estimation (NPE) have been proposed. We
seek to make ML-based atmospheric retrieval (1) more reliable and accurate with
verified results, and (2) more flexible with respect to the underlying neural
networks and the choice of the assumed noise models. First, we adopt flow
matching posterior estimation (FMPE) as a new ML approach to atmospheric
retrieval. FMPE maintains many advantages of NPE, but provides greater
architectural flexibility and scalability. Second, we use importance sampling
(IS) to verify and correct ML results, and to compute an estimate of the
Bayesian evidence. Third, we condition our ML models on the assumed noise level
of a spectrum (i.e., error bars), thus making them adaptable to different noise
models. Both our noise level-conditional FMPE and NPE models perform on par
with nested sampling across a range of noise levels when tested on simulated
data. FMPE trains about 3 times faster than NPE and yields higher IS
efficiencies. IS successfully corrects inaccurate ML results, identifies model
failures via low efficiencies, and provides accurate estimates of the Bayesian
evidence. FMPE is a powerful alternative to NPE for fast, amortized, and
parallelizable atmospheric retrieval. IS can verify results, thus helping to
build confidence in ML-based approaches, while also facilitating model
comparison via the evidence ratio. Noise level conditioning allows design
studies for future instruments to be scaled up, for example, in terms of the
range of signal-to-noise ratios.

Details

hide
Language(s):
 Dates: 2024-10-282025
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: Accepted for publication in Astronomy & Astrophysics
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: arXiv: 2410.21477
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451861
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

hide
Title: Astronomy & Astrophysics
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 693 Sequence Number: A42 Start / End Page: - Identifier: -