English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
EndNote (UTF-8)
 
DownloadE-Mail
 Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary
  About edible restaurants: Conflicts between syntax and semantics as revealed by ERPs

Kos, M., Vosse, T. G., Van den Brink, D., & Hagoort, P. (2010). About edible restaurants: Conflicts between syntax and semantics as revealed by ERPs. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, E222. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00222.

Item is

 

show all

Basic

hide
Item Permalink: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0012-D31D-0 Version Permalink: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-002A-F5C0-8
Genre: Journal Article

Files

hide Files
:
Kos_About edible restaurants_Front_Psych_2010.pdf (Publisher version), 4MB
View   Save
File Permalink:
https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-002A-F5BF-E
Name:
Kos_About edible restaurants_Front_Psych_2010.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
View
Copyright Date:
2010
Copyright Info:
© 2010 Kos, Vosse, van den Brink and Hagoort. This is an open-access article subject to an exclusive license agreement between the authors and the Frontiers Research Foundation, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited.
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

hide
 Creators:
Kos, Miriam1, Author
Vosse, Theo G.1, 2, Author
Van den Brink, Daniëlle1, 3, Author           
Hagoort, Peter1, 3, Author           
Affiliations:
1Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, External Organizations, ou_55236              
2Department of Psychology, Leiden University, Netherlands , ou_persistent22              
3Neurobiology of Language Group, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, ou_102880              

Content

hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: In order to investigate conflicts between semantics and syntax, we recorded ERPs, while participants read Dutch sentences. Sentences containing conflicts between syntax and semantics (Fred eats in a sandwich…/ Fred eats a restaurant…) elicited an N400. These results show that conflicts between syntax and semantics not necessarily lead to P600 effects and are in line with the processing competition account. According to this parallel account the syntactic and semantic processing streams are fully interactive and information from one level can influence the processing at another level. The relative strength of the cues of the processing streams determines which level is affected most strongly by the conflict. The processing competition account maintains the distinction between the N400 as index for semantic processing and the P600 as index for structural processing.

Details

hide
Language(s):
 Dates: 20102010
 Publication Status: Published online
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00222
URI: http://www.frontiersin.org/language_sciences/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00222/abstract
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

hide
Title: Frontiers in Psychology
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Frontiers Media S.A
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 1 Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: E222 Identifier: ISSN: 1664-1078