English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Number agreement in British and American English: Disagreeing to agree collectively

Bock, K., Butterfield, S., Cutler, A., Cutting, J. C., Eberhard, K. M., & Humphreys, K. R. (2006). Number agreement in British and American English: Disagreeing to agree collectively. Language, 82(1), 64-113.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
Bock_2006_number agreement.pdf (Publisher version), 510KB
File Permalink:
-
Name:
Bock_2006_number agreement.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
eDoc_access: USER
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Bock, Kathryn, Author
Butterfield, Sally, Author
Cutler, Anne1, 2, Author           
Cutting, J. Cooper, Author
Eberhard, Kathleen M., Author
Humphreys, Karin R., Author
Affiliations:
1Language Comprehension Group, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, ou_55203              
2Other Research, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, ou_55217              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: British andAmerican speakers exhibit different verb number agreement patterns when sentence subjects have collective headnouns. From linguistic andpsycholinguistic accounts of how agreement is implemented, three alternative hypotheses can be derived to explain these differences. The hypotheses involve variations in the representation of notional number, disparities in how notional andgrammatical number are used, and inequalities in the grammatical number specifications of collective nouns. We carriedout a series of corpus analyses, production experiments, andnorming studies to test these hypotheses. The results converge to suggest that British and American speakers are equally sensitive to variations in notional number andimplement subjectverb agreement in much the same way, but are likely to differ in the lexical specifications of number for collectives. The findings support a psycholinguistic theory that explains verb and pronoun agreement within a parallel architecture of lexical andsyntactic formulation.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2006
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: eDoc: 278166
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Language
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 82 (1) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 64 - 113 Identifier: -