English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Vowel perception: Effects of non-native language vs. non-native dialect

Cutler, A., Smits, R., & Cooper, N. (2005). Vowel perception: Effects of non-native language vs. non-native dialect. Speech Communication, 47(1-2), 32-42. doi:10.1016/j.specom.2005.02.001.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
Cutler_2005_vowel.pdf (Publisher version), 166KB
File Permalink:
-
Name:
Cutler_2005_vowel.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
eDoc_access: USER
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Cutler, Anne1, 2, Author           
Smits, Roel1, 2, Author
Cooper, Nicole1, 2, Author
Affiliations:
1Language Comprehension Group, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, ou_55203              
2Phonological Learning for Speech Perception, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, ou_55227              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: Three groups of listeners identified the vowel in CV and VC syllables produced by an American English talker. The listeners were (a) native speakers of American English, (b) native speakers of Australian English (different dialect), and (c) native speakers of Dutch (different language). The syllables were embedded in multispeaker babble at three signal-to-noise ratios (0 dB, 8 dB, and 16 dB). The identification performance of native listeners was significantly better than that of listeners with another language but did not significantly differ from the performance of listeners with another dialect. Dialect differences did however affect the type of perceptual confusions which listeners made; in particular, the Australian listeners’ judgements of vowel tenseness were more variable than the American listeners’ judgements, which may be ascribed to cross-dialectal differences in this vocalic feature. Although listening difficulty can result when speech input mismatches the native dialect in terms of the precise cues for and boundaries of phonetic categories, the difficulty is very much less than that which arises when speech input mismatches the native language in terms of the repertoire of phonemic categories available.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2005
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: eDoc: 240232
DOI: 10.1016/j.specom.2005.02.001
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Speech Communication
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 47 (1-2) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 32 - 42 Identifier: -