English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 PreviousNext  
  Neurophysiological evidence of delayed segmentation in a foreign language

Snijders, T. M., Kooijman, V., Cutler, A., & Hagoort, P. (2007). Neurophysiological evidence of delayed segmentation in a foreign language. Brain Research, 1178, 106-113. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2007.07.080.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
Snijders_2007_neurophysiological.pdf (Publisher version), 529KB
Name:
Snijders_2007_neurophysiological.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
eDoc_access: USER
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Snijders, Tineke M.1, Author           
Kooijman, Valesca2, 3, Author
Cutler, Anne2, 3, Author           
Hagoort, Peter1, 3, 4, Author           
Affiliations:
1FC Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, external, ou_55235              
2Language Comprehension Group, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, ou_55203              
3Phonological Learning for Speech Perception, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, ou_55227              
4Neurobiology of Language Group, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, Nijmegen, NL, ou_102880              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: Previous studies have shown that segmentation skills are language-specific, making it difficult to segment continuous speech in an unfamiliar language into its component words. Here we present the first study capturing the delay in segmentation and recognition in the foreign listener using ERPs. We compared the ability of Dutch adults and of English adults without knowledge of Dutch (‘foreign listeners’) to segment familiarized words from continuous Dutch speech. We used the known effect of repetition on the event-related potential (ERP) as an index of recognition of words in continuous speech. Our results show that word repetitions in isolation are recognized with equivalent facility by native and foreign listeners, but word repetitions in continuous speech are not. First, words familiarized in isolation are recognized faster by native than by foreign listeners when they are repeated in continuous speech. Second, when words that have previously been heard only in a continuous-speech context re-occur in continuous speech, the repetition is detected by native listeners, but is not detected by foreign listeners. A preceding speech context facilitates word recognition for native listeners, but delays or even inhibits word recognition for foreign listeners. We propose that the apparent difference in segmentation rate between native and foreign listeners is grounded in the difference in language-specific skills available to the listeners.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2007
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: eDoc: 322529
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.07.080
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Brain Research
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 1178 Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 106 - 113 Identifier: -