English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Sublexical units and supralexical combinatories in the processing of interfixed Dutch compounds

Krott, A., Hagoort, P., & Baayen, R. H. (2004). Sublexical units and supralexical combinatories in the processing of interfixed Dutch compounds. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(3), 453-471. doi:10.1080/769813936.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
Krott_2004_sublexical.pdf (Publisher version), 151KB
Name:
Krott_2004_sublexical.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Krott, Andrea, Author
Hagoort, Peter1, Author           
Baayen, R. Harald2, Author
Affiliations:
1FC Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, external, ou_55235              
2Other Research, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, ou_55217              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: This study addresses the supralexical inferential processes underlying wellformedness judgements and latencies for a specic sublexical unit that appears in Dutch compounds, the interfix. Production studies have shown that the selection of interfixes in novel Dutch compounds and the speed of
this selection is primarily determined by the distribution of interfixes in existing compounds that share the left constituent with the target compound, i.e. the ‘‘left constituent family’’. In this paper, we consider the question whether constituent families also affect wellformedness decisions of novel as well as existing Dutch compounds in comprehension. We visually presented compounds containing interfixes that were either in line with the bias of the left constituent family or not. In the case of existing compounds, we also presented variants with replaced interfixes. As in production, the bias of the left constituent family emerged as a crucial predictor for both acceptance rates and response latencies. This result supports the hypothesis that, as in production, constituent families are (co-)activated in comprehension. We argue that this co-activation is part of a supralexical inferential process, and we discuss how our data might be interpreted within sublexical and supralexical theories of morphological processing.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2004
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1080/769813936
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Language and Cognitive Processes
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 19 (3) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 453 - 471 Identifier: -