English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  The processing and representation of Dutch and English compounds: Peripheral morphological, and central orthographic effects

De Jong, N. H., Feldman, L. B., Schreuder, R., Pastizzo, M., & Baayen, R. H. (2002). The processing and representation of Dutch and English compounds: Peripheral morphological, and central orthographic effects. Brain and Language, 81(1-3), 555-567. doi:10.1006/brln.2001.2547.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
dejong_2002_processing.pdf (Publisher version), 65KB
Name:
dejong_2002_processing.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
eDoc_access: USER
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
De Jong, Nivja H.1, 2, Author
Feldman, Laurie B., Author
Schreuder, Robert2, 3, Author
Pastizzo, Matthew, Author
Baayen, R. Harald1, 2, Author
Affiliations:
1Pioneer, external, ou_55239              
2Other Research, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, ou_55217              
3Interfacultaire Werkgroep Taal- en Spraakgedrag, external, ou_55237              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: In this study, we use the association between various measures of the morphological family and decision latencies to reveal the way in which the components of Dutch and English compounds are processed. The results show that for constituents of concatenated compounds in both languages, a position-related token count of the morphological family plays a role, whereas English open compounds show an effect of a type count, similar to the effect of family size for simplex words. When Dutch compounds are written with an artificial space, they reveal no effect of type count, which shows that the differential effect for the English open compounds is not superficial. The final experiment provides converging evidence for the lexical consequences of the space in English compounds. Decision latencies for English simplex words are better predicted from counts of the morphological family that include concatenated and hyphenated but not open family members.

Details

show
hide
Language(s):
 Dates: 2002
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: eDoc: 26791
DOI: 10.1006/brln.2001.2547
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Brain and Language
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 81 (1-3) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 555 - 567 Identifier: -