Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT
  The influence of spelling on phonological encoding in word reading, object naming, and word generation

Roelofs, A. (2006). The influence of spelling on phonological encoding in word reading, object naming, and word generation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(1), 33-37.

Item is

Dateien

einblenden: Dateien
ausblenden: Dateien
:
Roelofs_2006_influence.pdf (Verlagsversion), 78KB
Name:
Roelofs_2006_influence.pdf
Beschreibung:
-
OA-Status:
Sichtbarkeit:
Öffentlich
MIME-Typ / Prüfsumme:
application/pdf
Technische Metadaten:
Copyright Datum:
-
Copyright Info:
-
Lizenz:
-

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:
ausblenden:
externe Referenz:
restricted access to full text (selected user) (Ergänzendes Material)
Beschreibung:
Roelofs_2006_influence.pdf
OA-Status:
externe Referenz:
restricted access to full text (institute-wide) (Ergänzendes Material)
Beschreibung:
Roelofs_2006_influence.pdf
OA-Status:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Roelofs, Ardi1, 2, Autor           
Affiliations:
1Language Production Group Levelt, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, ou_55206              
2Utterance Encoding, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, ou_55234              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: -
 Zusammenfassung: Does the spelling of a word mandatorily constrain spoken word production, or does it do so only when spelling is relevant for the production task at hand? Damian and Bowers (2003) reported spelling effects in spoken word production in English using a prompt–response word generation task. Preparation of the response words was disrupted when the responses shared initial phonemes that differed in spelling, suggesting that spelling constrains speech production mandatorily. The present experiments, conducted in Dutch, tested for spelling effects using word production tasks in which spelling was clearly relevant (oral reading in Experiment 1) or irrelevant (object naming and word generation in Experiments 2 and 3, respectively). Response preparation was disrupted by spelling inconsistency only with the word reading, suggesting that the spelling of a word constrains spoken word production in Dutch only when it is relevant for the word production task at hand.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n):
 Datum: 2006
 Publikationsstatus: Erschienen
 Seiten: -
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: Expertenbegutachtung
 Identifikatoren: eDoc: 295063
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Genre der Quelle: Zeitschrift
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
Seiten: - Band / Heft: 13 (1) Artikelnummer: - Start- / Endseite: 33 - 37 Identifikator: -