English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Language specificity in perception of paralinguistic intonational meaning

Chen, A., Gussenhoven, C., & Rietveld, T. (2004). Language specificity in perception of paralinguistic intonational meaning. Language and Speech, 47(4), 311-349.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
Chen_2004_language-specificity.pdf (Publisher version), 587KB
Name:
Chen_2004_language-specificity.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
eDoc_access: USER
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Chen, Aoju1, 2, Author           
Gussenhoven, Carlos, Author
Rietveld, Toni, Author
Affiliations:
1Language Acquisition Group, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, ou_55202              
2Utterance Encoding, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, ou_55234              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: This study examines the perception of paralinguistic intonational meanings deriving from Ohala’s Frequency Code (Experiment 1) and Gussenhoven’s Effort Code (Experiment 2) in British English and Dutch. Native speakers of British English and Dutch listened to a number of stimuli in their native language and judged each stimulus on four semantic scales deriving from these two codes: SELF-CONFIDENT versus NOT SELF-CONFIDENT, FRIENDLY versus NOT FRIENDLY (Frequency Code); SURPRISED versus NOT SURPRISED, and EMPHATIC versus NOT EMPHATIC (Effort Code). The stimuli, which were lexically equivalent across the two languages, differed in pitch contour, pitch register and pitch span in Experiment 1, and in pitch register, peak height, peak alignment and end pitch in Experiment 2. Contrary to the traditional view that the paralinguistic usage of intonation is similar across languages, it was found that British English and Dutch listeners differed considerably in the perception of “confident,” “friendly,” “emphatic,” and “surprised.” The present findings support a theory of paralinguistic meaning based on the universality of biological codes, which however acknowledges a languagespecific component in the implementation of these codes.

Details

show
hide
Language(s):
 Dates: 2004
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: eDoc: 327335
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Language and Speech
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 47 (4) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 311 - 349 Identifier: -