English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  The use of referential context and grammatical gender in parsing: A reply to Brysbaert and Mitchell

Van Berkum, J. J. A., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (2000). The use of referential context and grammatical gender in parsing: A reply to Brysbaert and Mitchell. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29(5), 467-481. doi:10.1023/A:1005168025226.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
vanberkumetal-replytobrysmitch-jopr2000.pdf (Publisher version), 47KB
Name:
vanberkumetal-replytobrysmitch-jopr2000.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Van Berkum, Jos J. A.1, 2, Author           
Hagoort, Peter1, 3, Author           
Brown, Colin M.1, Author
Affiliations:
1Neurocognition of Language Processing , MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, Nijmegen, NL, ou_55225              
2Department of Psychonomics, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands, ou_persistent22              
3Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, External Organizations, ou_55236              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: Based on the results of an event-related brain potentials (ERP) experiment (van Berkum, Brown, & Hagoort. 1999a, b), we have recently argued that discourse-level referential context can be taken into account extremely rapidly by the parser. Moreover, our ERP results indicated that local grammatical gender information, although available within a few hundred milliseconds from word onset, is not always used quickly enough to prevent the parser from considering a discourse-supported, but agreement-violating, syntactic analysis. In a comment on our work, Brysbaert and Mitchell (2000) have raised concerns about the methodology of our ERP experiment and have challenged our interpretation of the results. In this reply, we argue that these concerns are unwarranted and, that, in contrast to our own interpretation, the alternative explanations provided by Brysbaert and Mitchell do not account for the full pattern of ERP results.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2000
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1023/A:1005168025226
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Journal of Psycholinguistic Research
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: New York : Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 29 (5) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 467 - 481 Identifier: Other: 954925462140
ISSN: 0090-6905