English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Segmenting the body into parts: Evidence from biases in tactile perception

De Vignemont, F., Majid, A., Jola, C., & Haggard, P. (2009). Segmenting the body into parts: Evidence from biases in tactile perception. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 500-512. doi:10.1080/17470210802000802.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
Vignemont_2009_segmenting.pdf (Publisher version), 204KB
File Permalink:
-
Name:
Vignemont_2009_segmenting.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
De Vignemont, F., Author
Majid, Asifa1, 2, 3, Author           
Jola, C., Author
Haggard, P., Author
Affiliations:
1Language and Cognition Group, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, ou_55204              
2Categories across Language and Cognition, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, Nijmegen, NL, ou_55211              
3Body parts in perception , ou_persistent22              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: How do we individuate body parts? Here, we investigated the effect of body segmentation between hand and arm in tactile and visual perception. In a first experiment, we showed that two tactile stimuli felt farther away when they were applied across the wrist than when they were applied within a single body part (palm or forearm), indicating a “category boundary effect”. In the following experiments, we excluded two hypotheses, which attributed tactile segmentation to other, nontactile factors. In Experiment 2, we showed that the boundary effect does not arise from motor cues. The effect was reduced during a motor task involving flexion and extension movements of the wrist joint. Action brings body parts together into functional units, instead of pulling them apart. In Experiments 3 and 4, we showed that the effect does not arise from perceptual cues of visual discontinuities. We did not find any segmentation effect for the visual percept of the body in Experiment 3, nor for a neutral shape in Experiment 4. We suggest that the mental representation of the body is structured in categorical body parts delineated by joints, and that this categorical representation modulates tactile spatial perception.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 20092009
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1080/17470210802000802
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 62 Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 500 - 512 Identifier: Other: 954925255152
ISSN: 1747-0218