English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  The strong/weak syllable distinction in English

Fear, B. D., Cutler, A., & Butterfield, S. (1995). The strong/weak syllable distinction in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 1893-1904. doi:10.1121/1.412063.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
Cutler_1995_The strong.pdf (Publisher version), 2MB
Name:
Cutler_1995_The strong.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Fear, Beverley D.1, Author
Cutler, Anne2, 3, Author           
Butterfield, Sally4, Author
Affiliations:
1Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
2MRC Applied Psychology Unit, Cambridge, UK, ou_55203              
3Language Comprehension Group, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
4MRC Applied Psychology Unit, Cambridge, UK

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: Strong and weak syllables in English can be distinguished on the basis of vowel quality, of stress, or of both factors. Critical for deciding between these factors are syllables containing unstressed unreduced vowels, such as the first syllable of automata. In this study 12 speakers produced sentences containing matched sets of words with initial vowels ranging from stressed to reduced, at normal and at fast speech rates. Measurements of the duration, intensity, F0, and spectral characteristics of the word-initial vowels showed that unstressed unreduced vowels differed significantly from both stressed and reduced vowels. This result held true across speaker sex and dialect. The vowels produced by one speaker were then cross-spliced across the words within each set, and the resulting words' acceptability was rated by listeners. In general, cross-spliced words were only rated significantly less acceptable than unspliced words when reduced vowels interchanged with any other vowel. Correlations between rated acceptability and acoustic characteristics of the cross-spliced words demonstrated that listeners were attending to duration, intensity, and spectral characteristics. Together these results suggest that unstressed unreduced vowels in English pattern differently from both stressed and reduced vowels, so that no acoustic support for a binary categorical distinction exists; nevertheless, listeners make such a distinction, grouping unstressed unreduced vowels by preference with stressed vowels

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 1995
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1121/1.412063
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: New York, etc. : American Institute of Physics for the Acoustical Society of America.
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 97 Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 1893 - 1904 Identifier: Other: 110975506069643
ISSN: 0001-4966