Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT
  "Capacity" reconsidered: Interindividual differences in language comprehension and individual alpha frequency

Bornkessel, I., Fiebach, C. J., Friederici, A. D., & Schlesewsky, M. (2004). "Capacity" reconsidered: Interindividual differences in language comprehension and individual alpha frequency. Experimental Psychology, 51(4), 279-289. doi:10.1027/1618-3169.51.4.279.

Item is

Dateien

einblenden: Dateien
ausblenden: Dateien
:
bornkessel_774.pdf (Verlagsversion), 78KB
 
Datei-Permalink:
-
Name:
bornkessel_774.pdf
Beschreibung:
-
OA-Status:
Sichtbarkeit:
Eingeschränkt (Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, MLNP; )
MIME-Typ / Prüfsumme:
application/pdf
Technische Metadaten:
Copyright Datum:
-
Copyright Info:
eDoc_access: INSTITUT
Lizenz:
-

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Bornkessel, Ina1, Autor           
Fiebach, Christian J.1, Autor           
Friederici, Angela D.1, Autor           
Schlesewsky, Matthias, Autor
Affiliations:
1Department Neuropsychology, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society, ou_634551              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: -
 Zusammenfassung: The influence of interindividual differences in cognitive mechanisms on language comprehension remains controversial not only due to conflicting experimental findings, but also in view of the difficulty associated with determining which measure should be used in participant classification. Here, we address the latter problem by proposing that an electrophysiological measure, individual alpha frequency (IAF), may be a suitable means of classifying interindividual differences in sentence processing. Interindividual differences in IAF have been shown to correlate with performance on memory tasks and speed of information processing. In two experiments using event-related brain potentials (ERPs), IAF-based participant groups differed systematically with regard to the processing of ambiguous sentences such that the low-IAF group showed a sustained positivity in the ambiguous region, while the high-IAF group did not. These interindividual differences were independent of whether the ambiguity was syntactic (Experiment 1) or sentence-level semantic (Experiment 2). Moreover, they were reliable only when participants were classified according to IAF, but not in classifications based on reading span, speed of processing (reaction time), or accuracy of processing (error rate).

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n): eng - English
 Datum: 2004
 Publikationsstatus: Erschienen
 Seiten: -
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: -
 Identifikatoren: eDoc: 239545
Anderer: P6965
DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169.51.4.279
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: Experimental Psychology
Genre der Quelle: Zeitschrift
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: Göttingen, Germany : American Psychological Association (PsycARTICLES)
Seiten: - Band / Heft: 51 (4) Artikelnummer: - Start- / Endseite: 279 - 289 Identifikator: ISSN: 1618-3169
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/954925573941