English
 
User Manual Privacy Policy Disclaimer Contact us
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Counting in everyday life: Discrimination and enumeration

Nan, Y., Knösche, T. R., & Luo, Y.-J. (2006). Counting in everyday life: Discrimination and enumeration. Neuropsychologia, 44(7), 1103-1113. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.10.020.

Item is

Basic

show hide
Item Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0010-A6EB-2 Version Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-002C-2714-2
Genre: Journal Article

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
nan_counting_neuropsy.pdf (Publisher version), 424KB
 
File Permalink:
-
Name:
nan_counting_neuropsy.pdf
Description:
-
Visibility:
Restricted (Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, MLNP; )
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
eDoc_access: INSTITUT
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Nan, Yun1, Author              
Knösche, Thomas R.1, 2, Author              
Luo, Yue-Jia, Author
Affiliations:
1Methods and Development Unit MEG and EEG: Signal Analysis and Modelling, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society, ou_634559              
2Methods and Development Unit Cortical Networks and Cognitive Functions, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society, ou_634557              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: Subitizing; Counting; Event-related potential (ERP)
 Abstract: Enumerating the number of items in a set accurately and quickly is a basic mathematical skill. This ability is especially crucial in the more real-life situations, where relevant items have to be discriminated from irrelevant distracters. Although much work has been done on the brain mechanisms and neural correlates of the enumeration and/or discrimination process, no agreement has been reached yet. We used event-related potentials (ERPs) to show the time course of brain activity elicited by a task that involved both enumeration and discrimination at the same time. We found that even though the two processes run to some extent in parallel, discrimination seems to take place mainly in an earlier time window (from 100 ms after the stimulus onset) than enumeration (beyond 200 ms after the stimulus onset). Moreover, electrophysiological evidence based on the N2 and P3 components make it reasonable to argue for the existence of a dichotomy between subitizing (for sets of less than four items) and counting (for sets of four and more items). Source estimation suggests that subitizing and counting, though being distinct brain processes, do recruit similar brain areas.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2006
 Publication Status: Published in print
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: eDoc: 285683
Other: P7212
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.10.020
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Neuropsychologia
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Oxford : Pergamon
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 44 (7) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 1103 - 1113 Identifier: ISSN: 0028-3932
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/954925428258