English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  How does learning to read affect speech perception?

Pattamadilok, C., Knierim, I. N., Duncan, K. J., & Devlin, J. T. (2010). How does learning to read affect speech perception? The Journal of Neuroscience, 30(25), 8435-8444. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5791-09.2010.

Item is

Files

show Files

Locators

hide
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Green

Creators

hide
 Creators:
Pattamadilok, Chotiga1, Author
Knierim, Iris Nikola2, Author           
Duncan, Keith J.3, Author
Devlin, Joseph T.3, Author
Affiliations:
1Unité de Recherche en Neurosciences Cognitives, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium, ou_persistent22              
2Minerva Research Group Neurocognition of Rhythm in Communication, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society, ou_634560              
3Cognitive, Perceptual and Brain Sciences and Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, United Kingdom , ou_persistent22              

Content

hide
Free keywords: Acoustic Stimulation; Adolescent; Adult; Analysis of Variance; Brain Mapping; Decision Making; Female; Humans; Male; Occipital Lobe; Reaction Time; Reading; Speech Perception; Temporal Lobe; Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
 Abstract: Behavioral studies have demonstrated that learning to read and write affects the processing of spoken language. The present study investigates the neural mechanism underlying the emergence of such orthographic effects during speech processing. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to tease apart two competing hypotheses that consider this orthographic influence to be either a consequence of a change in the nature of the phonological representations during literacy acquisition or a consequence of online coactivation of the orthographic and phonological representations during speech processing. Participants performed an auditory lexical decision task in which the orthographic consistency of spoken words was manipulated and repetitive TMS was used to interfere with either phonological or orthographic processing by stimulating left supramarginal gyrus (SMG) or left ventral occipitotemporal cortex (vOTC), respectively. The advantage for consistently spelled words was removed only when the stimulation was delivered to SMG and not to vOTC, providing strong evidence that this effect arises at a phonological, rather than an orthographic, level. We propose a possible mechanistic explanation for the role of SMG in phonological processing and how this is affected by learning to read. Copyright © 2010 the authors.

Details

hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2009-11-222010-04-082010-06-23
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: eDoc: 512139
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5791-09.2010
PMC: PMC6634630
PMID: 20573891
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

hide
Project name : -
Grant ID : 06/11-342
Funding program : Action de Recherche Concertée
Funding organization : French Community of Belgium
Project name : -
Grant ID : -
Funding program : Brains Back to Brussels program
Funding organization : Institut d'Encouragement de la Recherche Scientique et de l'Innovation de Bruxelles
Project name : -
Grant ID : -
Funding program : -
Funding organization : Biotechnology and Biosciences Research Council
Project name : -
Grant ID : -
Funding program : -
Funding organization : Wellcome Trust (WT)

Source 1

hide
Title: The Journal of Neuroscience
  Other : J. Neurosci.
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Baltimore, MD : The Society
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 30 (25) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 8435 - 8444 Identifier: ISSN: 0270-6474
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/954925502187