English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Punctuation and intonation effects on clause and sentence wrap-up: Evidence from eye movements

Hirotani, M., Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (2006). Punctuation and intonation effects on clause and sentence wrap-up: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 54(3), 425-443. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.12.001.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
hirotani_punctuation.pdf (Publisher version), 565KB
 
File Permalink:
-
Name:
hirotani_punctuation.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Restricted (Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, MLNP; )
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
eDoc_access: INSTITUT
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Hirotani, Masako1, Author           
Frazier, Lyn, Author
Rayner, Keith, Author
Affiliations:
1Department Neuropsychology, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society, ou_634551              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: Reading; Eye movements; Clause wrap-up; Sentence wrap-up; Intonation
 Abstract: Three eye movement studies examined the role of punctuation in reading. In Experiment 1, although a comma at the end of a clause facilitated overall reading times for the sentence, first pass times were longer at the end of comma-marked clauses than clauses without a comma (or the same material in clause medial position). The data supported the dwell time hypothesis which claims that readers pause at punctuation marks. To explore the possibility that dwell time/wrap-up effects are really due to pausing at the ends of intonational phrases, Experiment 2 tested non-redundant punctuation in structures where a comma corresponds to an obligatory intonational phrase boundary in speech. The intonation hypothesis was supported for vocatives and parentheticals but not for non-restrictive relative clauses. Relative clauses were further investigated in Experiment 3. Overall, the data were consistent with the intonation explanation for wrap-up effects but only if it is assumed that non-restrictive relatives and other asides receive less attention than do other parts of a sentence.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2006
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: eDoc: 286594
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2005.12.001
Other: P7254
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Journal of Memory and Language
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: New York : Academic Press
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 54 (3) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 425 - 443 Identifier: ISSN: 0749-596X
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/954928495417