English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  The resolution of case conflicts from a neurophysiological perspective

Frisch, S., & Schlesewsky, M. (2005). The resolution of case conflicts from a neurophysiological perspective. Cognitive Brain Research, 25(2), 484-498. doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.07.010.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
frisch_resolution.pdf (Publisher version), 499KB
 
File Permalink:
-
Name:
frisch_resolution.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Restricted (Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, MLNP; )
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
eDoc_access: INSTITUT
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Frisch, Stefan1, Author           
Schlesewsky, Matthias, Author
Affiliations:
1Department Neuropsychology, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society, ou_634551              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: Event-related brain potentials (ERPs); Language processing; Case; Thematic role; N400; P600
 Abstract: We present two ERP experiments examining the resolution of language processing conflicts involving the multidimensional linguistic feature case, which determines processing in both syntactic and interpretive respects. Ungrammatical German structures with two identically case-marked arguments (double subject or double object constructions) were tested. In earlier studies, double subject constructions have been shown to elicit a biphasic pattern consisting of an N400 effect (a marker of thematic integration problems) followed by a P600 effect (a marker of syntactic ill-formedness). Here, we compare double nominative (subject case) constructions with double datives (indirect object case; Experiment 1) and double accusatives (direct object case; Experiment 2). All types of double case ungrammaticalities elicited a biphasic N400-P600 response. However, double datives differed from double nominatives in that they elicited a larger P600, suggesting that the ill-formedness is more salient in structures with two dative arguments. Double accusatives, by contrast, elicited a stronger N400 in comparison to double nominatives, suggesting that they induce more severe semantic-thematic integration problems. The results demonstrate that the human language comprehension system is sensitive to fine grained linguistic distinctions between different cases and utilizes these in its attempts to solve processing conflicts.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2005
 Publication Status: Published in print
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: eDoc: 246212
DOI: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.07.010
Other: P7132
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Cognitive Brain Research
  Other : Cognit. Brain Res.
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Amsterdam : Elsevier
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 25 (2) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 484 - 498 Identifier: ISSN: 0926-6410
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/954925385137_2