English
 
User Manual Privacy Policy Disclaimer Contact us
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Isn't it ironic? An electrophysiological exploration of figurative language processing

Regel, S., Gunter, T. C., & Friederici, A. D. (2011). Isn't it ironic? An electrophysiological exploration of figurative language processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(2), 277-293. doi:10.1162/jocn.2010.21411.

Item is

Basic

show hide
Item Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0011-28A6-D Version Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-002B-FFA4-3
Genre: Journal Article

Files

show Files

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Regel, Stefanie1, Author              
Gunter, Thomas C.1, Author              
Friederici, Angela D.1, Author              
Affiliations:
1Department Neuropsychology, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society, ou_634551              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: Although the neurocognitive processes underlying the comprehension of figurative language, especially metaphors and idioms, have been studied extensively, less is known about the processing of irony. In two experiments using event-related brain potentials (ERPs), we examined the types of cognitive processes involved in the comprehension of ironic and literal sentences and their relative time course. The experiments varied in modality (auditory, visual), task demands (comprehension task vs. passive reading), and probability of stimulus occurrence. ERPs consistently revealed a large late positivity (i.e., P600 component) in the absence of an N400 component for irony compared to equivalent literal sentences independent of modality. This P600 was shown to be unaffected by the factors task demands and probability of occurrence. Taken together, the findings suggest that the observed P600 is related to irony processing, and might be a reflection of pragmatic interpretation processes. During the comprehension of irony, no semantic integration difficulty arises (absence of N400), but late inferential processes appear to be necessary for understanding ironic meanings (presence of P600). This finding calls for a revision of current models of figurative language processing.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2011-02
 Publication Status: Published in print
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Method: -
 Identifiers: eDoc: 538215
Other: P11598
DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21411
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Cambridge, MA : MIT Press Journals
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 23 (2) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 277 - 293 Identifier: ISSN: 0898-929X
CoNE: /journals/resource/991042752752726