Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT
  How does cognition evolve? Phylogenetic comparative psychology

MacLean, E. L., Matthews, L. J., Hare, B. A., Nunn, C. L., Anderson, R. C., Aureli, F., et al. (2012). How does cognition evolve? Phylogenetic comparative psychology. Animal Cognition, 15, 223-238. doi:10.1007/s10071-011-0448-8.

Item is

Dateien

einblenden: Dateien
ausblenden: Dateien
:
MacLean_et_al_2012_Animal_Cognition.pdf (Verlagsversion), 472KB
Datei-Permalink:
-
Name:
MacLean_et_al_2012_Animal_Cognition.pdf
Beschreibung:
-
OA-Status:
Sichtbarkeit:
Öffentlich
MIME-Typ / Prüfsumme:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technische Metadaten:
Copyright Datum:
2011
Copyright Info:
-
Lizenz:
-

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
MacLean, Evan L.1, Autor
Matthews, Luke J.2, Autor
Hare, Brian A.1, 3, Autor
Nunn, Charles L.2, Autor
Anderson, Rindy C.4, Autor
Aureli, Filippo5, Autor
Brannon, Elizabeth M.3, 6, Autor
Call, Josep7, Autor
Drea, Christine M.1, 4, Autor
Emery, Nathan J.8, Autor
Haun, Daniel B. M.7, 9, 10, Autor           
Herrmann, Esther7, Autor
Jacobs, Lucia F.11, Autor
Platt, Michael L.1, 3, 12, Autor
Rosati, Alexandra G.1, 3, Autor
Sandel, Aaron A.13, Autor
Schroepfer, Kara K.1, Autor
Seed, Amanda M.14, Autor
Tan, Jingzhi1, Autor
Van Schaik, Carel P.15, Autor
Wobber, Victoria2, Autor mehr..
Affiliations:
1Department of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University, Durham, NC, ou_persistent22              
2Department of Human Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA,, ou_persistent22              
3Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, ou_persistent22              
4Biology Department, Duke University, Durham, NC, ou_persistent22              
5Research Centre in Evolutionary Anthropology and Palaeoecology, School of Natural Sciences and Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, ou_persistent22              
6Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, ou_persistent22              
7MPI for Evolutionary Anthropology, Max Planck Society, Leipzig, DE, ou_38004              
8School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, ou_persistent22              
9Comparative Cognitive Anthropology, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, ou_55209              
10Department of Psychology, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK, ou_persistent22              
11Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, ou_persistent22              
12Department of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, ou_persistent22              
13Department of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, ou_persistent22              
14School of Psychology, University of St Andrews, Scotland, UK, ou_persistent22              
15Anthropological Institute and Museum, University of Zu¨rich, Zurich, Switzerland, ou_persistent22              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: Phylogenetic comparative methods; Evolution; Adaptation; Phylogeny; Function; Cognitive evolution; Selective pressure
 Zusammenfassung: Now more than ever animal studies have the potential to test hypotheses regarding how cognition evolves. Comparative psychologists have developed new techniques to probe the cognitive mechanisms underlying animal behavior, and they have become increasingly skillful at adapting methodologies to test multiple species. Meanwhile, evolutionary biologists have generated quantitative approaches to investigate the phylogenetic distribution and function of phenotypic traits, including cognition. In particular, phylogenetic methods can quantitatively (1) test whether specific cognitive abilities are correlated with life history (e.g., lifespan), morphology (e.g., brain size), or socio-ecological variables (e.g., social system), (2) measure how strongly phylogenetic relatedness predicts the distribution of cognitive skills across species, and (3) estimate the ancestral state of a given cognitive trait using measures of cognitive performance from extant species. Phylogenetic methods can also be used to guide the selection of species comparisons that offer the strongest tests of a priori predictions of cognitive evolutionary hypotheses (i.e., phylogenetic targeting). Here, we explain how an integration of comparative psychology and evolutionary biology will answer a host of questions regarding the phylogenetic distribution and history of cognitive traits, as well as the evolutionary processes that drove their evolution.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n): eng - English
 Datum: 20112011-08-2720112012
 Publikationsstatus: Erschienen
 Seiten: -
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: Expertenbegutachtung
 Identifikatoren: DOI: 10.1007/s10071-011-0448-8
PMID: 21927850
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: Animal Cognition
  Andere : Anim. Cogn.
Genre der Quelle: Zeitschrift
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: Berlin : Springer
Seiten: - Band / Heft: 15 Artikelnummer: - Start- / Endseite: 223 - 238 Identifikator: ISSN: 1435-9448
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/954933111396