English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  ³⁶Cl bomb peak: comparison of modeled and measured data

Heikkilä, U., Beer, J., Feichter, J., Alfimov, V., Synal, H.-A., Schotterer, U., et al. (2009). ³⁶Cl bomb peak: comparison of modeled and measured data. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 9, 4145-4156. Retrieved from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/9/4145/2009/acp-9-4145-2009.html.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
acp-9-4145-2009.pdf (Publisher version), 581KB
Name:
acp-9-4145-2009.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Heikkilä, U., Author
Beer, J., Author
Feichter, J.1, Author           
Alfimov, V., Author
Synal, H.-A., Author
Schotterer, U., Author
Eichler, A., Author
Schwikowski, M., Author
Thompson, L., Author
Affiliations:
1The Atmosphere in the Earth System, MPI for Meteorology, Max Planck Society, ou_913550              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: The extensive nuclear bomb testing of the fifties and sixties and the final tests in the seventies caused a strong ³⁶Cl peak that has been observed in ice cores world-wide. The measured ³⁶Cl deposition fluxes in eight ice cores (Dye3, Fiescherhorn, Grenzgletscher, Guliya, Huascarán, North GRIP, Inylchek (Tien Shan) and Berkner Island) were compared with an ECHAM5-HAM general circulation model simulation (1952–1972). We find a good agreement between the measured and the modeled ³⁶Cl fluxes assuming that the bomb test produced global ³⁶Cl input was ~80 kg. The model simulation indicates that the fallout of the bomb test produced ³⁶Cl is largest in the subtropics and mid-latitudes due to the strong stratosphere-troposphere exchange. In Greenland the ³⁶Cl bomb signal is quite large due to the relatively high precipitation rate. In Antarctica the ³⁶Cl bomb peak is small but is visible even in the driest areas. The model suggests that the large bomb tests in the Northern Hemisphere are visible around the globe but the later (end of sixties and early seventies) smaller tests in the Southern Hemisphere are much less visible in the Northern Hemisphere. The question of how rapidly and to what extent the bomb produced ³⁶Cl is mixed between the hemispheres depends on the season of the bomb test. The model results give an estimate of the amplitude of the bomb peak around the globe.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2009
 Publication Status: Published in print
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  Alternative Title : Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 9 Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 4145 - 4156 Identifier: -