English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Aerosol lidar intercomparison in the framework of the EARLINET project. 2. Aerosol backscatter algorithms

Böckmann, C., Wandinger, U., Ansmann, A., Bösenberg, J., Amiridis, V., Boselli, A., et al. (2004). Aerosol lidar intercomparison in the framework of the EARLINET project. 2. Aerosol backscatter algorithms. Applied Optics, 43(4), 977-989.

Item is

Files

show Files

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Böckmann, C., Author
Wandinger, U., Author
Ansmann, A., Author
Bösenberg, Jens1, Author
Amiridis, V., Author
Boselli, A., Author
Delaval, A., Author
De Tomasi, F., Author
Frioud, M., Author
Grigorov, I. V., Author
Hagard, A., Author
Horvat, M., Author
Iarlori, M., Author
Komguem, L., Author
Kreipl, S., Author
Larchevque, G., Author
Matthias, Volker2, Author           
Papayannis, A., Author
Pappalardo, G., Author
Rocadenbosch, F., Author
Rodrigues, J. A., AuthorSchneider, J., AuthorShcherbakov, V., AuthorWiegner, M., Author more..
Affiliations:
1Max Planck Society, ou_persistent13              
2Climate Processes, MPI for Meteorology, Max Planck Society, ou_913551              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: EXTINCTION PROFILES; RAMAN LIDAR; INVERSION; ATMOSPHERE
 Abstract: An intercomparison of aerosol backscatter lidar algorithms was performed in 2001 within the framework of the European Aerosol Research Lidar Network to Establish an Aerosol Climatology (EARLINET). The objective of this research was to test the correctness of the algorithms and the influence of the lidar ratio used by the various lidar teams involved in the EARLINET for calculation of backscatter-coefficient profiles from the lidar signals. The exercise consisted of processing synthetic lidar signals of various degrees of difficulty. One of these profiles contained height-dependent lidar ratios to test the vertical influence of those profiles on the various retrieval algorithms. Furthermore, a realistic incomplete overlap of laser beam and receiver field of view was introduced to remind the teams to take great care in the nearest range to the lidar. The intercomparison was performed in three stages with increasing knowledge on the input parameters. First, only the lidar signals were distributed; this is the most realistic stage. Afterward the lidar ratio profiles and the reference values at calibration height were provided. The unknown height-dependent lidar ratio had the largest influence on the retrieval, whereas the unknown reference value was of minor importance. These results show the necessity of making additional independent measurements, which can provide us with a suitable approximation of the lidar ratio. The final stage proves in general, that the data evaluation schemes of the different groups of lidar systems work well. (C) 2004 Optical Society of America

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2004-02-01
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: eDoc: 174031
ISI: 000188510900034
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Applied Optics
  Alternative Title : Appl. Optics
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 43 (4) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 977 - 989 Identifier: ISSN: 0003-6935