Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse




Journal Article

Simple paradigm for extra-cerebral tissue removal: algorithm and analysis

There are no MPG-Authors in the publication available
External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available

Carass, A., Cuzzocreo, J., Wheeler, M. B., Bazin, P.-L., Resnick, S. M., & Prince, J. L. (2011). Simple paradigm for extra-cerebral tissue removal: algorithm and analysis. Neuroimage, 56(4), 1982-1992. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.03.045.

Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0012-0F2D-D
Extraction of the brain—i.e. cerebrum, cerebellum, and brain stem—from T1-weighted structural magnetic resonance images is an important initial step in neuroimage analysis. Although automatic algorithms are available, their inconsistent handling of the cortical mantle often requires manual interaction, thereby reducing their effectiveness. This paper presents a fully automated brain extraction algorithm that incorporates elastic registration, tissue segmentation, and morphological techniques which are combined by a watershed principle, while paying special attention to the preservation of the boundary between the gray matter and the cerebrospinal fluid. The approach was evaluated by comparison to a manual rater, and compared to several other leading algorithms on a publically available data set of brain images using the Dice coefficient and containment index as performance metrics. The qualitative and quantitative impact of this initial step on subsequent cortical surface generation is also presented. Our experiments demonstrate that our approach is quantitatively better than six other leading algorithms (with statistical significance on modern T1-weighted MR data). We also validated the robustness of the algorithm on a very large data set of over one thousand subjects, and showed that it can replace an experienced manual rater as preprocessing for a cortical surface extraction algorithm with statistically insignificant differences in cortical surface position.