On the fidelity of large-eddy simulation of shallow precipitating cumulus 
convection

Matheou, G.; Chung, D.; Nuijens, L.; Stevens, Bjorn; Teixeira, J.

doi:10.1175/2011MWR3599.1

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Add to Basket

Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released

Journal Article

On the fidelity of large-eddy simulation of shallow precipitating cumulus convection

MPS-Authors

Nuijens, L.
Observations and Process Studies, The Atmosphere in the Earth System, MPI for Meteorology, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons37347

Stevens, Bjorn
A 2 - Climate Processes and Feedbacks, Research Area A: Climate Dynamics and Variability, The CliSAP Cluster of Excellence, External Organizations;
Director’s Research Group AES, The Atmosphere in the Earth System, MPI for Meteorology, Max Planck Society;

External Resource

No external resources are shared

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

Fulltext (public)

2011mwr3599%2E1.pdf
(Publisher version), 4MB

Supplementary Material (public)

There is no public supplementary material available

Citation

Matheou, G., Chung, D., Nuijens, L., Stevens, B., & Teixeira, J. (2011). On the fidelity of large-eddy simulation of shallow precipitating cumulus convection. Monthly Weather Review, 139, 2918-2939. doi:10.1175/2011MWR3599.1.

Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0012-2532-4

Abstract

The present study considers the impact of various choices pertaining to the numerical solution of the governing equations on large-eddy simulation (LES) prediction and the association of these choices with flow physics. These include the effect of dissipative versus nondissipative advection discretizations, different implementations of the constant-coefficient Smagorinsky subgrid-scale model, and grid resolution. Simulations corresponding to the trade wind precipitating shallow cumulus composite case of the Rain in Cumulus over the Ocean (RICO) field experiment were carried out. Global boundary layer quantities such as cloud cover, liquid water path, surface precipitation rate, power spectra, and the overall convection structure were used to compare the effects of different discretization implementations. The different discretization implementations were found to exert a significant impact on the LES prediction even for the cases where the process of precipitation was not included. Increasing numerical dissipation decreases cloud cover and surface precipitation rates. For nonprecipitating cases, grid convergence is achieved for grid spacings of 20 m. Cloud cover was found to be particularly sensitive, exhibiting variations between different resolution runs even when the mean liquid water profile had converged.