English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
Add to Basket
  Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released
Journal Article

Critical comments on dynamic causal modelling

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons19821

Lohmann,  Gabriele
Department Neurophysics, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons19872

Mueller,  Karsten
Methods and Development Unit Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons20055

Turner,  Robert
Department Neurophysics, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Lohmann, G., Erfurth, K., Mueller, K., & Turner, R. (2012). Critical comments on dynamic causal modelling. NeuroImage, 59(3), 2322-2329. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.025.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0012-2919-F
Abstract
Dynamic causal modelling (DCM) (Friston et al., 2003) is a technique designed to investigate the influence between brain areas using time series data obtained by EEG/MEG or functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The basic idea is to fit various models to time series data, and select one of those models using Bayesian model comparison. Here, we present a critical evaluation of DCM in which we show that DCM can be challenged on several grounds. We will discuss three main points relating to combinatorial explosion, the validity of the model selection procedure, and problems with respect to model validation.