English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Neural foundations of risk-return trade-off in investement decisions

MPS-Authors

Mohr,  Peter N.C.
Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany;
Berlin NeuroImaging Center and Neuroscience Research Center, Charité Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany;
MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

Biele,  Guido
Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany;
Berlin NeuroImaging Center and Neuroscience Research Center, Charité Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany;
MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

Krugel,  Lea K.
Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany;
Berlin NeuroImaging Center and Neuroscience Research Center, Charité Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany;
MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons22631

Heekeren,  Hauke R.
Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany;
Berlin NeuroImaging Center and Neuroscience Research Center, Charité Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany;
MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Mohr, P. N., Biele, G., Krugel, L. K., Li, S.-C., & Heekeren, H. R. (2010). Neural foundations of risk-return trade-off in investement decisions. NeuroImage, 49(3), 2556-2563. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.060.


Cite as: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0012-2E42-9
Abstract
Many decisions people make can be described as decisions under risk. Understanding the mechanisms that drive these decisions is an important goal in decision neuroscience. Two competing classes of risky decision making models have been proposed to describe human behavior, namely utility-based models and risk–return models. Here we used a novel investment decision task that uses streams of (past) returns as stimuli to investigate how consistent the two classes of models are with the neurobiological processes underlying investment decisions (where outcomes usually follow continuous distributions). By showing (a) that risk–return models can explain choices behaviorally and (b) that the components of risk–return models (value, risk, and risk attitude) are represented in the brain during choices, we provide evidence that risk–return models describe the neural processes underlying investment decisions well. Most importantly, the observed correlation between risk and brain activity in the anterior insula during choices supports risk–return models more than utility-based models because risk is an explicit component of risk–return models but not of the utility-based models.