English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Poster

Listening to speech in noise: Older adults’ individual differences in a speeded response task

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons86

Jesse,  Alexandra
Language Comprehension Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons81

Janse,  Esther
Individual Differences in Language Processing Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Jesse, A., & Janse, E. (2011). Listening to speech in noise: Older adults’ individual differences in a speeded response task. Poster presented at the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Seattle.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0012-2EB1-F
Abstract
Older listeners are more affected than younger listeners by background noise. In this study, we examined which perceptual and cognitive abilities contribute to older listeners‘ individual differences in recognizing speech in various listening conditions. Unlike in previous studies, we tested older adults in a speeded-response task where processing time, and hence post-perceptual processing, was limited. Sixty-six older adults with varying degrees of hearing loss were asked to press a button when they detected the phoneme ‗p‘ in meaningful sentences. Accuracy and response speed were to be maximized. The to-be-monitored speech stream was presented alone or with an informational masker (single-speaker noise) or an energetic masker (matched speech-shaped noise). Target detection was affected by both types of noise. Detections were slower and less accurate in the informational than in the energetic masking condition. Results of testing hearing acuity, temporal processing, attentional abilities, and working memory as predictors will be discussed.