English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Comparison of MISR and Meteosat-9 cloud-motion vectors

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons37247

Lonitz,  Katrin
Observations and Process Studies, The Atmosphere in the Earth System, MPI for Meteorology, Max Planck Society;
IMPRS on Earth System Modelling, MPI for Meteorology, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons37186

Horváth,  Ákos
Observations and Process Studies, The Atmosphere in the Earth System, MPI for Meteorology, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Lonitz, K., & Horváth, Á. (2011). Comparison of MISR and Meteosat-9 cloud-motion vectors. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres, 116: D24202. doi:10.1029/2011JD016047.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0012-3187-5
Abstract
Stereo motion vectors (SMVs) from the Multiangle Imaging SpectroRadiometer (MISR) were evaluated against Meteosat-9 cloud-motion vectors (CMVs) over a one-year period. In general, SMVs had weaker westerlies and southerlies than CMVs at all latitudes and levels. The E-W wind comparison showed small vertical variations with a mean difference of-0.4 m s -1,-1 m s -1,-0.7 m s -1 and corresponding rmsd of 2.4 m s -1, 3.8 m s -1, 3.5 m s -1 for low-, mid-, and high-level clouds, respectively. The N-S wind discrepancies were larger and steadily increased with altitude, having a mean difference of-0.8 m s -1,-2.9 m s -1,-4.4 m s -1 and rmsd of 3.5 m s -1, 6.9 m s -1, 9.5 m s -1 at low, mid, and high levels. The best overall agreement was found in marine stratocumulus off Namibia, while differences were larger in the Tropics and convective clouds. The SMVs were typically assigned to higher altitudes than CMVs. Attributing each observed height difference to MISR and/or Meteosat-9 retrieval biases will require further research; nevertheless, we already identified a few regions and cloud types where CMV height assignment seemed to be the one in error. In thin mid-and high-level clouds over Africa and Arabia as well as in broken marine boundary layer clouds the 10.8-μm brightness temperature-based heights were often biased low due to radiance contributions from the warm surface. Contrarily, low-level CMVs in the South Atlantic were frequently assigned to mid levels by the CO 2-slicing method in multilayer situations. We also noticed an apparent cross-swath dependence in SMVs, whereby retrievals were less accurate on the eastern side of the MISR swath than on the western side. This artifact was traced back to sub-pixel MISR co-registration errors, which introduced cross-swath biases in E-W wind, N-S wind, and height of 0.6 m s -1, 2.6 m s -1, and 210 m. Copyright 2011 by the American Geophysical Union.