English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Do German Employers Support Board-Level Codetermination? The Paradox of Individual Support and Collective Opposition

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons41266

Paster,  Thomas
Institutioneller Wandel im gegenwärtigen Kapitalismus, MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

SER_10_2012_Paster.pdf
(Any fulltext), 297KB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Paster, T. (2012). Do German Employers Support Board-Level Codetermination? The Paradox of Individual Support and Collective Opposition. Socio-Economic Review, 10(3), 471-495. doi:10.1093/ser/mwr017.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0012-3F31-4
Abstract
Existing studies on employers' preferences towards institutions of class cooperation suggest that certain types of employers support these institutions because they provide economic benefits. To test this thesis, this paper examines attitudes of German employers towards board-level codetermination. It compares firms' attitudes at the individual and the collective level: individual firms' attitudes are analysed using survey data and media statements from individual executives; collective attitudes are analysed using policy statements from the national business federations. The paper finds considerable support for board-level codetermination among individual firms but continued opposition from the federations. The paper suggests that this difference arises from the federations strategically over-representing dissatisfied members. The promotion of voluntary arrangements allows the federations to campaign against board-level codetermination without alienating the satisfied members. The paper highlights the need to complement a micro-foundational analysis of preference formation with an analysis of intra-associational processes of preference aggregation.