English
 
User Manual Privacy Policy Disclaimer Contact us
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Transnational Governance as Contested Institution-building: China, Merchants, and Contract Rules in the Cotton Trade

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons41274

Quark,  Amy A.
Projekte von Gastwissenschaftlern und Postdoc-Stipendiaten, MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society;
Department of Sociology, The College of William & Mary, Williamsburg, USA;

Fulltext (public)

PaS_39_2011_Quark.pdf
(Publisher version), 2MB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Quark, A. A. (2011). Transnational Governance as Contested Institution-building: China, Merchants, and Contract Rules in the Cotton Trade. Politics & Society, 39(1), 3-39. doi:10.1177/0032329210394997.


Cite as: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0012-3FAB-5
Abstract
We are in an era of uncertainty over whose rules will govern global economic integration. With the growing market share of Chinese firms and the power of the Chinese state it is unclear if Western firms will continue to dominate transnational governance. Exploring these dynamics through a study of contract rules in the global cotton trade, this article conceptualizes commodity chain governance as a contested process of institution-building. To this end, the global commodity chain/global value chain (GCC/GVC) framework must be revised to better account for the broader institutional context of commodity chain governance, institutional variation across space, and strategic action in the construction of legitimate governance arrangements. I provide a more dynamic model of GCC governance that stresses how strategic action, existing institutions, and dominant discourses intersect as firms and states compete for institutional power within a commodity chain. This advances our understandings of how commodity chain governance emerges and changes over time.