English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
Add to Basket
  Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released
Contribution to Collected Edition

Conclusions: Local and Global Sources of Capitalist Diversity

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons41153

Crouch,  Colin
Auswärtiges Wissenschaftliches Mitglied, MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society;
University of Warwick Business School, UK;

/persons/resource/persons41294

Schröder,  Martin Georg
Institutioneller Wandel im gegenwärtigen Kapitalismus, MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons41324

Voelzkow,  Helmut
Problemlösungsfähigkeit der Mehrebenenpolitik in Europa, MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society;

External Resource

http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199551170.003.0008
(Any fulltext)

Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Crouch, C., Schröder, M. G., & Voelzkow, H. (2009). Conclusions: Local and Global Sources of Capitalist Diversity. In C. Crouch, & H. Voelzkow (Eds.), Innovation in Local Economies: Germany in Comparative Context (pp. 169-188). Oxford: Oxford University Press.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0012-449F-D
Abstract
This chapter presents some concluding thoughts. It begins with a review of the objectives of the research project on which this book was based. It then discusses the findings of the case studies. It provides answers to the three questions raised in Chapter 1: Do governance structures of the local economies conform to the national innovation regime of their country, in which they are ‘embedded’, or do local economies institutionally diverge? Can it be shown that particularities in the governance of local economies contribute to the economic success of these entities? Does the divergence of local economies from structural patterns of the national innovation and production system enable us to suggest in which institutional elements local economies may successfully diverge from the national model and in which not?