日本語
 
Help Privacy Policy ポリシー/免責事項
  詳細検索ブラウズ

アイテム詳細


公開

学術論文

Institutional Embeddedness and the Strategic Leeway of Actors: The Case of the German Therapeutical Biotech Industry

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons41234

Lange,  Knut
Wissenschaft, Technik und Innovationssysteme, MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
フルテキスト (公開)

SER_7_2009_Lange.pdf
(全文テキスト(全般)), 299KB

付随資料 (公開)
There is no public supplementary material available
引用

Lange, K. (2009). Institutional Embeddedness and the Strategic Leeway of Actors: The Case of the German Therapeutical Biotech Industry. Socio-Economic Review, 7(2), 181-207. doi:10.1093/ser/mwn029.


引用: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0012-44DC-3
要旨
This article aims at examining the strategic leeway of firms pursuing business strategies incompatible with the dominant institutional environment in a given market economy. In order to evaluate this question, we focus on the therapeutic biotech industry and draw a German–British comparison. Proponents of the varieties-of-capitalism (VoC) approach assume that German firms underperform in this industrial sector in comparison to British firms due to the institutional framework in which German firms operate; this framework is assumed to provide them with hardly any strategic latitude. The VoC approach is challenged by two alternative perspectives, in both of which it is believed that firms can have a high level of strategic leeway; in the first approach this is possible due to institutional heterogeneity within national market economies; and in the second approach, the above can be seen as the result of economic internationalization. Our empirical findings show that British firms are indeed more competitive in the therapeutical biotech industry, but only to a limited extent. German firms perform better than projected by the VoC approach because they operate in an institutionally heterogeneous environment and due to the impact of internationalization. Thus, we argue for the integration of these three perspectives in one explanatory approach.